Search 

Azcourts.gov

Arizona Judicial Branch



FAQ

Register       Login

NEW! The Court acted on many pending rule petitions at its recent Rules Agenda.  

Click on the Amendments from Recent Rules Agendas link below to go directly to the amendments and orders for each one.

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence

 

Proposed Local Rules
                 Welcome!
This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 12 Jun 2018 04:00 PM by  Allyson Flanagan
R-18-0014 Supreme Court Rules 32, 46-49, 53, 55-58 & 60-63
 5 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
FAIRWorkgroups
New Member
Posts:12 New Member

--
10 Jan 2018 02:25 PM
    Jennifer A. Greene
    Assistant Counsel
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    Bar No. 015760
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 414
    Phoenix, AZ 85007-3327
    Phone: (602) 452-3555
    jgreene@courts.az.gov

    Would clarify the process for appointing and overseeing the functions of Chief Bar Counsel.

    Filed January 10, 2018

    Comments must be submitted on or before May 21, 2018.
    Attachments
    Katherine Novak
    New Member
    Posts:6 New Member

    --
    21 May 2018 09:40 AM
    Attached is the comment of the Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee (ARC).

    Katherine Novak
    knovak@courts.az.gov
    602-452-3415
    Attachments
    Paul Avelar
    New Member
    Posts:3 New Member

    --
    21 May 2018 02:16 PM
    Pursuant to Rule 28(D)(b)(ii), I submit the following comments in support of and in opposition to R-18-0014. This Court has, over the years, taken steps to shield the chief bar counsel from the influence of the bar. Although I support most of R-18-0014 because it reinforces the separation, R-18-0014’s proposed Rule 49(e) potentially increases the Board of Governors’ influence over the chief bar counsel. Accordingly, this Court should adopt all of R-18-0014 expect proposed Rule 49(e), which should be rejected.
    The State Bar is an “integrated” bar association. It combines both regulatory and trade association functions in a single, non-governmental, nonprofit (501(c)(6) – trade association) organization. The State Bar is run by the Board of Governors, a group that consists largely of lawyers elected by lawyers and no one else. I have previously noted the conflicts of interest and separation of powers problems inherent in such an organization, Paul Avelar Comments to R-16-0013, and will not belabor them here.
    I believe this Court is aware of the conflicts of interest in the integrated bar association model and has, over the years, attempted to separate the regulatory portions of the State Bar from the lawyer-controlled trade association functions. One of the ways the Court has done this is to establish a professional disciplinary prosecution department that, though physically housed in the State Bar’s offices, is not overseen by the Board of Governors. See Report of the Task Force on the Review of the Role and Governance Structure of the State Bar of Arizona (Sept. 1, 2013) at 13 (“[A]ttorney admissions and discipline are primarily functions of the Supreme Court, and only to a lesser degree of the SBA’s professional staff, which reports to the SBA’s executive director rather than to the board.”).
    Portions of R-18-0014 reinforce the separation of the regulatory aspects of the State Bar from the trade association functions and should be approved by this Court. Proposed Rules 49(a), (b), and (c), for example, make clear that the chief bar counsel (and his or her staff) acts under authority granted by this Court, not the Board of Governors, and that chief bar counsel is appointed by the executive director, subject to this Court’s approval, not the Board of Governors’ approval. Other changes in R-18-0014 make technical corrections in various Rules to conform to this understanding of the authority and obligations of chief bar counsel. Because these proposed changes reinforce the separation of regulatory powers from the trade association aspects of the State Bar, this Court should approve them.
    Proposed Rule 49(e), however, grants the Board of Governors additional oversight of the “performance of the disciplinary duties delegated to the chief bar counsel.” Under this proposed rule, the Board of Governors will appoint a committee to review the chief bar counsel and the committee will have the authority “to review individual cases” and make recommendations “regarding bar discipline activities.” This provision thus threatens to give the Board of Governors, through its oversight committee, influence over the chief bar counsel, including in individual cases of discipline. If enacted, this would undermine the wall of separation this Court has erected between the regulatory powers and trade association influence. Because the trade association should not have any influence over regulatory powers, this Court should not approve proposed Rule 49(e).
    For the foregoing reasons, I urge the Court to adopt R-18-0014 except for proposed Rule 49(e). The regulatory functions of the State Bar must be kept separate from the trade association functions.

    Paul V. Avelar (AZ Bar No. 023078)
    Managing Attorney
    Institute for Justice Arizona Office
    398 S Mill Avenue Ste 301
    Tempe, AZ 85281
    Phone: (480) 557-8300
    Fax: (480) 557-8305
    http://www.ij.org/arizona
    Mark Harrison
    New Member
    Posts:3 New Member

    --
    21 May 2018 04:09 PM
    Mark I. Harrison, SBN# 001226
    2929 N. Central Ave, Suite 2100
    Phoenix, AZ 85012
    602-640-9324
    mharrison@omlaw.com
    Attachments
    State Bar of Arizona
    New Member
    Posts:48 New Member

    --
    21 May 2018 04:30 PM
    Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421
    General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288
    (602) 340-7236
    Patricia.seguin@staff.azbar.org

    The State Bar of Arizona submits the attached comment to this Petition.
    Attachments
    Allyson Flanagan
    New Member
    Posts:17 New Member

    --
    12 Jun 2018 04:00 PM
    Jennifer A. Greene
    Assistant Counsel
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    Bar No. 015760
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 414
    Phoenix, AZ 85007-3327
    Phone: (602) 452-3555
    jgreene@courts.az.gov

    Reply by Petitioner
    Attachments
    You are not authorized to post a reply.