Search 

Court of Appeals

Division One

Search Decisions

Search filter ON - Top 1000 records found    Clear search filter
Judge: Portley, Maurice
Search Decisions

12345678910...
7/24/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0266CAFE VALLEY v. NAVIDIOPINION
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

 Can a corporation seek declaratory judgment to resolve a dispute with a shareholder over the inspection and copying of corporate records?
7/24/2014   1 CA-JV 13-0308DAVID F., MICHELLE F. v. DCS, et al.MEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

7/22/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0421STATE v. MILLANESMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

7/22/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0545PONDEROSA, et al. v. COCONINO, et al.OPINION
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

 

Whether Coconino County has the discretion to refuse to call subdivision performance bonds under Arizona Revised Statutes section 11-821(c) and Coconino County Subdivision Ordinance No. 82-3, section 4.14(A)(2).

7/22/2014   1 CA-CV 12-0608HERTZ/COY v. COYMEMORANDUM
 John C. Gemmill, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Kent E. Cattani, Concur

7/22/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0491STATE v. BARBAMEMORANDUM
 Donn Kessler, Author; Patricia K. Norris, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

7/22/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0391BUBBAS v. ADHS/HUMBLEMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

7/22/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0493STATE v. HARRISONMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

7/17/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0058RZENDZIAN v. M&I BANKMEMORANDUM
 John C. Gemmill, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Kent E. Cattani, Concur

7/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0689STATE v. KOECKESMEMORANDUM
 Patricia K. Norris, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

7/15/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0276MIDTOWN v. FARMERSMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

7/15/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0276MIDTOWN v. FARMERSOPINION
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

 

Can an insurer be sued under A.R.S. § 33-934(A) if it pays a claim without resolving a perfected lien?

7/10/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0327WASHINGTON v. PELLERITOMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Diane M. Johnsen, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

7/10/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0337HAVEN v. TAYLOR et al.MEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

7/10/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0780STATE v. MONTEROMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

7/10/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0544STATE v. CUMMINGSMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

7/8/2014   1 CA-CR 14-0025STATE v. MATZKANINMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/26/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0126STATE v. MONFELIOPINION
 John C. Gemmill, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Kent E. Cattani, Concur

 Whether the mandatory 180-day jail sentence set forth in A.R.S. § 28-1382(E)(1) for misdemeanor violation of  A.R.S. § 28-1382(A)(2) (second offender with blood alcohol level over .20) is unconstitutional because it is more severe than the minimum sentence of 4 months in prison for a third offender with blood alcohol level similarly over .20 convicted of felony aggravated DUI under A.R.S.  § 28-1383(A)(2), (D)(2), and (L)(1).
Constitutionality Decision
A.R.S. § 28-1382(E)(1).  Equal protection and due process.
6/26/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0625STATE v. DUNBARMEMORANDUM
 Donn Kessler, Author; Patricia K. Norris, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0543STATE v. SYLVESTERMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0756STATE v. TORRESMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0619STATE v. WEBBMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0206STATE v. PINZONMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0414STATE v. SENECAMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-JV 14-0014TRICIA C. v. DCS, C.C.MEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-JV 13-0269IN RE: ARMON S.MEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Samuel A. Thumma, Concur; Patricia A. Orozco, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-JV 14-0024ROBERT K. v. ADCS, M.F.MEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0381STATE v. CHEEMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 12-0581STATE v. SCHELLMEMORANDUM
 Patricia K. Norris, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/17/2014   1 CA-CR 12-0550STATE v. SMITHMEMORANDUM
  1 CA-CR 14-0246STATE v. SMITH
 Patricia K. Norris, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/12/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0304MILLER v. MILLERMEMORANDUM
 Donn Kessler, Author; Patricia K. Norris, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/12/2014   1 CA-CV 12-0797BRANIGAN v. FREDRICKSONMEMORANDUM
 Patricia K. Norris, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/10/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0487SYSCO v. HOSKINS, et al.OPINION
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

 Whether a party may create a valid judgment lien under Arizona Revised Statute Section 33-961 by filing an unsigned minute entry.
6/5/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0132STATE v. FLORESMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0608STATE v. BROWNMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CR 12-0745STATE v. AGUIRRE-TINOCOMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0392COOPER v. MOTTAMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0289ROBLES v. STATE FARMMEMORANDUM
 Patricia K. Norris, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CR 12-0296STATE v. COLLINSMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/5/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0049STATE v. FOXMEMORANDUM
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

6/3/2014   1 CA-CV 12-0849SAGE v. HARRISONMEMORANDUM
 Kent E. Cattani, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; John C. Gemmill, Concur

6/3/2014   1 CA-CR 13-0490STATE v. GUINARDMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Donn Kessler, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

5/29/2014   1 CA-MH 13-0089IN THE MATTER OF LARRY B.MEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

5/27/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0423VONG v. AUNE, et al.OPINION
 Margaret H. Downie, Author; Michael J. Brown, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

 Whether, based on rational basis review, the Board of Cosmetology violated appellant's constitutional rights by applying existing sanitization standards to  so-called "fish pedicures."
5/27/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0248WELLS FARGO v. CROWN, et al.MEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

5/27/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0324ALEXANDER v. BILL LUKIEMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

5/27/2014   1 CA-SA 14-0066SAHLIN v. HON FRIDLUND-HORNE/HARTFIELDMEMORANDUM
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Maurice Portley, Concur

5/27/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0280ROZENMAN v. ROZENMANMEMORANDUM
 Maurice Portley, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

5/27/2014   1 CA-CR 12-0781STATE v. SANCHEZMEMORANDUM
 John C. Gemmill, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Kent E. Cattani, Concur

5/22/2014   1 CA-CV 13-0492MACK v. HON. DELLAS/PHOENIXOPINION
 Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maurice Portley, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

 1.  Whether the crime of obstructing a highway or other public thoroughfare existed at common law prior to Arizona statehood as an offense for which a defendant was entitled to a jury trial, so that a defendant charged with misdemeanor obstructing a highway or other public thoroughfare pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-2906(A) is potentially entitled to a trial by jury. 

2.  Whether the elements of present-day misdemeanor obstructing a highway or other public thoroughfare are substantially similar to the common law public nuisance of highway obstruction.
12345678910...