Search 

Judicial Performance Review

Who Judges the Judges? You Do!

NEWS and MEETINGS

 

 

No matching records found.

 

 

Judicial Decisions

This search utility below is available for decisions filed with the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Division I.

Click here to search Court of Appeals, Division II.
Search filter ON - Top 1000 records found    Clear search filter
Judge: Thompson, Jon W.
Search Decisions

12345678910...
5/23/2017   1 CA-CR 16-0134STATE v. BRADFORDMEMORANDUM
 Jon W. Thompson, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur

5/18/2017   1 CA-CR 15-0816-PRPCSTATE v. BARRIGAMEMORANDUM
 Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

5/18/2017   1 CA-JV 16-0458CRAIG B. v. DCS, C.G.MEMORANDUM
 Jon W. Thompson, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur

5/16/2017   1 CA-CV 16-0159WILLIAMSON v. O'BRIENOPINION
 Randall M. Howe, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

 Did the trial court err by dismissing plaintiff's claim with prejudice for failure to provide an expert opinion affidavit pursuant to A.R.S. section 12-2603?
5/16/2017   1 CA-JV 16-0528CHRISTERPHER Z. v. DCS, et al.MEMORANDUM
 Jon W. Thompson, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur

5/16/2017   1 CA-CV 16-0416GLAZER v. STATEOPINION
 Randall M. Howe, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

 

1. Does A.R.S. section 41-622(F), which states that interest against any judgment paid for out of the risk management revolving fund shall accrue at a reduced rate for the duration of an appeal, apply when the judgment was mistakenly paid for out of the construction insurance fund if the State rectified the mistake by reimbursing the construction insurance fund from the risk management revolving fund?

2. Did the trial court err in applying A.R.S. section 41-622(F) to the entire $7.8 million judgment when the State is self-insured up to $7 million and the State's insurance carrier will reimburse the State for any judgment amount over $7 million pursuant to its excess insurance policy?

5/16/2017   1 CA-JV 16-0507ELIZABETH O. v. DCS, et al.MEMORANDUM
 Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

5/16/2017   1 CA-CR 16-0653STATE v. MORALESMEMORANDUM
 Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

5/16/2017   1 CA-CR 16-0073STATE v. HASANMEMORANDUM
 Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Kent E. Cattani, Concur; Jon W. Thompson, Concur

5/11/2017   1 CA-CR 15-0684STATE v. ESCALANTEOPINION
 Jon W. Thompson, Author; Diane M. Johnsen, Concur; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur

 

1. Whether the subject officers' testimony is drug courier profile evidence or modus operandi evidence.

2. Whether the testimony was offered as substantive evidence--thus improper, and therefore admitted in error.

3. Whether the error is reversible.

 

12345678910...