JPR Banner
Home > Judicial Performance Reports > Judicial Decisions

Judicial Decisions

This search utility below is available for decisions filed with the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Division I.

Click here to search Court of Appeals, Division II.
Search filter ON - Top 1000 records found    Clear search filter
Judge: Timmer, Ann Scott
Search Decisions

12345678910...
4/11/2024   CR-21-0397-PRSTATE ex rel MITCHELL v HON. PALMER/DURANDOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

4/9/2024   CV-23-0005-PRPLANNED PARENTHOOD et al v KRISTIN MAYES/HAZELRIGGOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Dissent; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur in the Dissent

 Constitutionality Decision

Held:  Simultaneous enforcement of the overlapping criminal and regulatory provisions of A.R.S. § 13-3603 and Title 36, including A.R.S. § 36-2322, does not facially violate physicians’ constitutional due process right to notice of their criminal and regulatory liability because the statutes clearly define the conduct prohibited and the punishment authorized.

 

4/9/2024   CV-23-0085-PRSATAMIAN v GREAT DIVIDE et alOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

3/22/2024   CV-22-0228-PRCAO et al. v PFP DORSEY et al.OPINION
 Clint Bolick, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision

A.R.S. § 33-1228 (2018) does not violate article 2, section 17 of the Arizona Constitution when applied to parties who have incorporated the statute by reference into their condominium declaration.  Under such circumstances, § 33-1228 does not effect a taking of condominium unit owners’ property because the power to terminate and sell the condominium in this case derives from contract law—not statute.

3/11/2024   SB-22-0056-APIn the Matter of LISE R. WITTOPINION
 William Montgomery, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

3/7/2024   CV-23-0123-CQIn re: ERICA KRYSTAL RIGGINSOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; Clint Bolick, Dissent; Robert M. Brutinel, Dissent; James P. Beene, Dissent

2/23/2024   CV-23-0009-CQIn re: STEVEN R. DRUMMOND, MARY A. DRUMMONDOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Dissent

2/6/2024   CV-23-0076-PRNEPTUNE SWIMMING FOUNDATION v CITY OF SCOTTSDALEOPINION
 Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

1/26/2024   CV-22-0231-PRBARRIGA v ADES/PRECISIONOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

1/23/2024   CR-23-0042-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v DANIEL LOUIS SANTILLANESOPINION
 Kathryn H. King, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; John Pelander, Concur

12345678910...