Search 

Judicial Performance Review

Who Judges the Judges? You Do!

NEWS and MEETINGS

 

 

No matching records found.

 

 

Judicial Decisions

This search utility below is available for decisions filed with the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Division I.

Click here to search Court of Appeals, Division II.
Search filter ON - Top 1000 records found    Clear search filter
Judge: Timmer, Ann A. Scott
Search Decisions

12345678910...
10/18/2017   CV-16-0134-PRRASOR/MILLER v NORTHWEST HOSPITAL LLCOPINION
 Clint Bolick, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur; John R. Lopez, IV, Concur

10/13/2017   CR-16-0390-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v LYNN LAVERN BURBEYOPINION
 Clint Bolick, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur

10/4/2017   CR-16-0435-PRDALE ALLEN WRIGHT v HON. GATES/STATEOPINION
 Scott Bales, Author; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur; John R. Lopez, IV, Concur

10/2/2017   CV-16-0051-PRFRANK R. v MOTHER GOOSE ADOPTIONSOPINION
 Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur

9/26/2017   CR-16-0285-PRJOHN FITZGERALD v HON. MYERS/STATE ex rel BRNOVICHOPINION
  John Pelander, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur; Garye L Vasquez, Concur in the Result

9/25/2017   CV-16-0259-PRMARIANNE N. v DCS/O.N./I.T./A.G.OPINION
 Ann A. Scott Timmer, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Peter J. Eckerstrom, Dissent; Clint Bolick, Dissent; Andrew W. Gould, Dissent

 

Amended by Order on September 26, 2017.

 


Constitutionality Decision

Holding that applying Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 64(C) in pretrial proceedings does not conflict with A.R.S.  § 8-863(C) in violation of the separation of powers required by the Arizona Constitution, article 3.

9/22/2017   CV-16-0199-PRDIANE FLYNN et vir v SARAH CAMPBELLOPINION
 John R. Lopez, IV, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Andrew W. Gould, Concur

 

Amended by Letter on September 25, 2017

9/19/2017   CV-16-0266-PRKIMBERLY McLAUGHLIN v HON. JONES/SUZAN McLAUGHLINOPINION
 Scott Bales, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Kenton D. Jones, Concur; John R. Lopez, IV, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur in part; Dissent in part

 Constitutionality Decision

Holding that A.R.S. § 25-814(A)(1)’s marital paternity presumption must apply to same-sex couples as well as opposite-sex couples under Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015), and Pavan v. Smith, 137 S. Ct. 2075 (2017).

9/14/2017   CR-16-0384-PRLOUIS E CESPEDES v HON. LEE/STATEOPINION
 Andrew W. Gould, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, IV, Dissent; Robert M. Brutinel, Dissent; Clint Bolick, Dissent

8/17/2017   CV-16-0301-SASTATE ex rel BRNOVICH v CITY OF TUCSON/DEWITOPINION
  John Pelander, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur in part; Andrew W. Gould, Concur in part; John R. Lopez, IV, Concur

 

Amended by Order on August 17, 2017

PLEASE NOTE: On August 17, 2017, an Order was filed correcting the following sentences:

¶ 53, shall be amended by changing the word “quoting” to “citing” immediately before “Duncan v. Louisiana,” as shown below.



Constitutionality Decision

Upholding relevant portions of S.B. 1487, codified in A.R.S. § 41-194.01, under article 6, section 5(6) of the Arizona Constitution, and rejecting challenges that S.B. 1487 violates the separation of powers and this Court’s rule-making authority under article 3 and article 6, sections 1, 5(5), respectively, of the Arizona Constitution.

 

Upholding A.R.S. §§ 12-943, 12-945(B), and 13-3108(F) against challenge that a conflicting city ordinance supersedes and controls over the statutes under article 13, section 2 of the Arizona Constitution.

12345678910...