Search Opinions/Memo Decs


Search filter ON - 39 records found    Clear search filter
Date Range: 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2013
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Search Decisions

1234
12/27/2013   CR-11-0331-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v WILLIAM CRAIG MILLEROPINION
 Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

11/21/2013   CR-09-0081-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER MATHEW PAYNEOPINION
 Rebecca White Berch, Author; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur in part

 This Opinion Amends the Opinion filed on August 21, 2013.

11/21/2013   CR-13-0060-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v RICHARD J GLASSELOPINION
 Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

11/7/2013   CR-13-0087-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v ANTHONY DURANOPINION
  John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

10/23/2013   CR-11-0157-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v STEPHEN DOUGLAS REEVESOPINION
 Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. §§ 13-752(G), (I) (presentation of evidence to penalty phase jury) and A.R.S. §§ 13-751(C), (F) (burden of establishing mitigating circumstances) constitutional under U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) and U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process).
9/26/2013   CV-13-0039-PRCAVE CREEK UNIFIED SCHOOL et al v DUCEY/STATEOPINION
  John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision
Holding that HB 2008 (2010) violates the Voter Protection Act, Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 1, § 1(6)(B)-(C), (14), by effectively repealing, amending, or superseding certain public education funding requirements in A.R.S. § 15-901.01, a voter-approved referendum measure.
9/17/2013   SB-12-0035-APIn the Matter of LISA M AUBUCHONOPINION
 Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur

 PLEASE NOTE:  On 10/25/2013, an Order was filed amending paragraph 51, page 17, fourth bulletpoint, delete the words "Stapley I" and insert the words "grand jury matters."

The corrected sentence should read:

Although the record supports a finding that Aubuchon agreed to file the criminal and civil cases against Judge Donahoe to compel his recusal from grand jury matters, these acts did not constitute a conspiracy to prevent him from enjoying a right or privilege secured by the Constitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.


9/13/2013   CV-13-0225-SADOBSON et al v STATE ex rel APP COURT APPOINTMENTSOPINION
 Scott Bales, Author; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Patricia K. Norris, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision
Holding H.B. 2600, which would require judicial nominating commissions to submit at least five nominees to the governor for appointment to fill a judicial vacancy, unless a commission rejects an applicant by a two-thirds vote, unconstitutional because Article 6 of Arizona’s Constitution requires the commissions to submit not less than three nominees for each vacancy.
8/22/2013   CR-10-0031-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v EFREN MEDINAOPINION
 Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

8/21/2013   CR-09-0081-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER MATHEW PAYNEOPINION
 Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur

1234