FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].



Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas
 

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 01 Mar 2018 10:09 AM by  Jennifer Greene
R-17-0031 Supreme Court Rules 31, 38 and 39 with Request for Late Filing
 1 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Jennifer Greene
New Member
Posts:35 New Member

--
23 Feb 2017 04:16 PM
    Hons. Ryan Andrews, Chair and Randall Howe, Vice Chair
    Arizona State, Tribal, and Federal Court Forum
    c/o AOC Legal Services
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 414
    (602) 452-3325
    [email protected]
    Filed February 23, 2017

    Would allow tribal governments from other states seeking to exercise their rights under ICWA in Arizona child custody proceedings to avoid some pro hac vice appearance requirements; to obtain special admission of out-of-state attorneys representing tribes in ICWA cases; and to use a non-lawyer representative designated by a tribe in ICWA proceedings.

    3/2/2017 Request to Consider Untimely Petition DENIED. Petition will be considered in due course during Court's 2018 rules cycle.

    Comments must be submitted on or before May 21, 2018.

    IT IS ORDERED canceling the comment period as moot. In addition to emailing this order to recipients of Rule 28 notices, Court staff is to post the text of the order on the Court Rules Forum.
    Attachments
    Jennifer Greene
    New Member
    Posts:35 New Member

    --
    01 Mar 2018 10:09 AM
    Notice of withdrawal of petition filed on behalf of Petitioners Hon. Ryan Andrews and Hon. Randall Howe
    Attachments
    Topic is locked