FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to SACrtDocs@courts.az.gov.




Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules
                


Welcome!

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

PLEASE READ - CONTACT INFORMATION: 

PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU SUBMIT ALL YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION WHEN SUBMITTING A RULE PETITION OR COMMENT.  OTHERWISE, YOUR SUBMISSION MAY BE REJECTED AND WE WILL BE UNABLE TO ADVISE YOU AS TO WHY. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 01 May 2020 11:59 AM by  State Bar of Arizona
R-20-0026 Due Process for Attorneys
 2 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Martin Lynch
New Member
Posts:28 New Member

--
10 Jan 2020 09:12 PM
    Petition to amend SC Rule 32 to provide Due Process per Arizona State Constitution Art 2 Sect 23 . If the State Bar unjustly sanctions an Attorney, that Attorney may ask for and shall be provided a new hearing in Superior Court where the evidence shall be examined and the final decision on licensure and discipline made by a Jury randomly selected from the Jury pool.

    There shall be 10 Jurors, clear and convincing evidence, and a unanimous verdict to severely sanction an attorney.

    A license to practice law is a Fundamental Liberty Interest and shall not be arbitrarily denied without Due Process.

    The Fundamental Liberty Interest of any client should be subject to Due Process but Attorneys are not free to defend their clients when Attorneys are denied Due Process by the Rules of the State Bar.

    Coercive control by the State Bar undermines the integrity of the Judicial System.

    Martin Lynch
    WTPCS.org
    1120 W Broadway Rd #55
    Tempe AZ 85282
    602-550-6304

    Would amend Sup. Ct. Rule 32 to permit appeal of atty discipline to superior court, with a jury trial right

    Filed January 10, 2020.

    Comment must be submitted on or before May 1, 2020.

    Replies must be submitted on or before June 1, 2020.
    Attachments
    Michelle Martinez
    New Member
    Posts:9 New Member

    --
    21 Apr 2020 11:22 AM
    Hon. Ann A. Scott Timmer, Chair
    Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee
    1501 W. Washington St.
    Phoenix, AZ 85007

    Committee Staff:
    Mark D. Wilson
    602-452-3378
    Attachments
    State Bar of Arizona
    New Member
    Posts:88 New Member

    --
    01 May 2020 11:59 AM
    Comment of the State Bar of Arizona.

    Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421
    General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288
    (602) 340-7236
    patricia.seguin@staff.azbar.org
    Attachments
    Topic is locked