Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to SACrtDocs@courts.az.gov.

News:  We have corrected an error that prevented users from accessing some current criminal rules via Westlaw.

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 


Proposed Local Rules


This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 



PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 14 May 2020 10:27 AM by  Ed Pizarro Sr.
R-20-0021 Revise Rules of Family Law Procedure to Lawfully Implement Juries
 2 Replies
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Martin Lynch
New Member
Posts:28 New Member

13 Jan 2020 10:43 PM

    The People want juries to be applied only if necessary upon request of a litigant after the bench trial, because most Judges makes honest reasonable orders. The People themselves do not wish to produce Jury verdicts. We think the Courts should do that.

    The People are working on producing Statutes but regardless, the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land and everybody swears an oath per US Constitution Art 6 Sect 3. If you have not waived your Right, then it still exists. The idea that the Government has “unchecked Judicial Power” to arbitrarily take your children and all your money, that the Founders forgot about Judges, is non-sense. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and the purpose of a Jury is to prevent corruption. (Federalist 83 Paragraph 17) Everyone understands checks and balances.

    The tenth amendment says that if the Government does not wish to furnish the People with a firearm, or a Jury in Civil Court (AZ Const Art 2 Sect 23) then that responsibility falls to the People to furnish their own. Everyone agrees that we prefer the Courts furnish the Juries because Jury verdicts produced by the People might become problematic. The People will continue to purchase our own firearms as that matter seems to be obvious and uncontested at this time.

    Disclosure? Why do we need SCOTUS to affirm a Miranda decision for civil courts when disclosure is not prohibited by the Constitution? Could it be that the Courts do not want the People to know their rights? We cannot read minds. We can only observe the actions or inactions of the Court. Please include disclosure.

    Martin Lynch
    1120 W Broadway Rd #55
    Tempe AZ 85282

    Would amend the Family Law Rules to grant a right to a jury in family law court proceedings

    FILED: JANUARY 13, 2020

    Comment must be submitted on or before May 1, 2020.

    Replies must be submitted on or before June 1, 2020.

    State Bar of Arizona
    New Member
    Posts:88 New Member

    01 May 2020 12:04 PM
    Comment of the State Bar of Arizona.

    Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421
    General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016-6288
    (602) 340-7236
    Ed Pizarro Sr.
    New Member
    Posts:4 New Member

    14 May 2020 10:27 AM
    Arizona families are in peril. The contention driven from the separation of our families is further exacerbated by the often seen incompetence shown by some judicial officers. Mistakes are made and an appeal to correct the error(s) can be costly. Leaving the future of our families in the hands of just one person, who's influence has been and can be swayed, leads to lifelong suffering if the wrong custody arrangement is employed.

    The first judge tasked to handle my divorce did so explicitly per title 25. We departed amicably.
    The second judge, single handedly, devastated our family by involving a litany of "professionals" that derailed our intent to have a co-parenting arrangement. That judge, who's since been reassigned to the criminal division, has faced many complaints as she steamrolls over her judicial canons. Her inability to keep our case on track has resulted in tens of thousands of dollars diverted to inept social workers enacting bogus therapeutic intervention sessions, best interest attorneys prolonging status conferences, psychologists delaying evaluations and a slew of other appointees who's only motivation is their bottom line.

    Juries will allow a broader and unbiased decision to be made and keeping Arizona families together will result in happier homes. Having the litigants provide the jurors will be much simpler with services available via videoconference that seems to be the norm these days. A hurried, bothered, busy and/or biased judge will not make a complete and fair decision. My family is proof of that! Please support this amendment and allow families to have a fair perspective in their family dynamics. A perspective not driven by greed.


    Ed Pizarro Sr.
    AFCC member
    42424 N. Gavilan Peak Parkway
    Suite 9104
    Anthem, AZ 85086
    You are not authorized to post a reply.