Search 

Azcourts.gov

Arizona Judicial Branch



FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to SACrtDocs@courts.az.gov.


News:  We have corrected an error that prevented users from accessing some current criminal rules via Westlaw.
Message from the Chief Justice


Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence

 

Proposed Local Rules
                 Welcome!
This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 20 May 2016 09:29 PM by  Martin Lynch
R-16-0030 Rule 72, Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure
 1 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Ellen Crowley
New Member
Posts:17 New Member

--
12 Jan 2016 10:32 AM
    R-16-0030

    Petition to Amend Rule 72, Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure

    Would change allegedly unconstitutional provisions of the rule relating to Family Law Masters

    Petitioner:
    Martin Lynch
    ACR Member
    AFCC Member
    MCAFM Member
    FixFamilyCourts.com
    National Parents Organization
    ReformFamilyCourtsAZ PAC Chairman
    FCLU.org President of the Arizona Chapter
    General Manager, We The People Court Services LLC
    Board Member and Chairman of the Legislative Committee – AZFR.org
    1120 W Broadway Rd, Apt 55 Tempe AZ 85282-1255
    602-550-6304 mdl2222222222@gmail.com

    Date of Filing: January 11, 2016

    Comments due on or before May 20, 2016.

    DENIED.

    Attachments
    Martin Lynch
    New Member
    Posts:19 New Member

    --
    20 May 2016 09:29 PM
    Observation: No opinions objecting to these two Rule 72 measures have yet been registered by anyone. Granted R-16-0037 is somewhat recent.

    Request for Public Hearing per SC Rule 28(E) – Request is hereby made and applies to both R-16-0030 and R-16-0037. Both measures seek to protect the Public from harm and it is reasonable to cover all topics related to Rule 72 in the same forum.

    Ref: Petition R-16-0030 seeks to have precise language from Lavit v Superior Court inserted into the “Immunity” provisions of both Rule 72 and Rule 74. Lavit is referenced in Note 3 of ARS 25-406.

    “Activities which are ministerial and not part of the clinical and reporting functions or activities contrary to a court order are unprotected.”

    Petitioner
    /s/ Martin Lynch
    ACR Member
    AFCC Member
    MCAFM Member
    National Parents Organization
    ReformFamilyCourtsAZ PAC Chairman
    FCLU.org President of the Arizona Chapter
    General Manager, We The People Court Services LLC
    Board Member and Chairman of the Legislative Committee – AZFR.org
    1120 W Broadway Rd, Apt 55 Tempe AZ 85282-1255
    602-550-6304
    mdl2222222222@gmail.com

    May 20, 2016
    Attachments
    Topic is locked


    <