Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to SACrtDocs@courts.az.gov.

News:  We have corrected an error that prevented users from accessing some current criminal rules via Westlaw.
Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence


Proposed Local Rules
This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 17 May 2017 03:49 PM by  ceMember
R-17-0008 Petition to Amend Rule 39, Ariz. R. Sup. Ct.
 1 Replies
Topic is locked
Author Messages
New Member
Posts:14 New Member

05 Jan 2017 01:20 PM
    Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421
    Acting General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th St., Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016

    Would amend Rule 39, Rules of the Supreme Court, to allow the State Bar to establish procedures for attorneys who are not members of the State Bar of Arizona to electronically file with the State Bar applications for fees for pro hac vice admission.

    FILED 1/05/2017

    Comments due May 22, 2017.

    ORDERED: Petition to Amend Rule 39, Arizona Rules of Supreme Court= ADOPTED as modified, effective January 1, 2018.
    New Member
    Posts:6 New Member

    17 May 2017 03:49 PM

    Hon. William O'Neil, Vice Chair
    c/o Attorney Regulation Advisory Committee
    1501 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ 85007
    Topic is locked