FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].



Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas
 

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 16 Oct 2018 02:16 PM by  Aaron Nash
R-18-0005 Petition to amend Supreme Court Rule 123 and Juvenile Court rules 19, 47, 75 & 86
 4 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
FAIRWorkgroups
New Member
Posts:12 New Member

--
09 Jan 2018 07:44 AM
    Hon. Timothy Ryan, Juvenile Court Presiding Judge
    Maricopa County Superior Court

    Hon. Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Superior Court for Maricopa County
    620 W. Jackson St.
    Phoenix, AZ 85003
    [email protected]

    The presiding judge of the juvenile court in the superior court in Maricopa County and the Clerk of the Superior Court in Maricopa County request amendments related to accessing juvenile court records.

    Would provide guidance to the custodian of records on appropriate access to juvenile case records based on the role of the requester as to the child(ren).

    FILED: January 9, 2018.

    EXTENDED COMMENT PERIOD: Comments must be submitted on or before September 28, 2018.

    Petitioner's reply due October 19, 2018.

    ORDERED: Petition to Amend Rule 123, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona; Rules 19, 47, 75 & 86, Rules of Procedure for the Juvenile Court = ADOPTED AS MODIFIED, effective January 1, 2019.
    Attachments
    FAIRWorkgroups
    New Member
    Posts:12 New Member

    --
    18 May 2018 04:57 PM
    Hon. Valerie Wyant, President
    Arizona Association of Superior Court Clerks
    200 N San Francisco St
    Flagstaff, AZ 86001
    928-679-7615

    The Arizona Association of Superior Court Clerks submit the attached comments supporting the petition.
    Attachments
    bddMember
    New Member
    Posts:10 New Member

    --
    21 May 2018 02:04 PM
    Filed on behalf of:
    Dave K. Byers, Administrative Director
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 414
    Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3327
    Phone: (602) 452-3301
    [email protected]

    Attachments
    bcrmember
    New Member
    Posts:19 New Member

    --
    27 Sep 2018 03:24 PM
    Comment filed on behalf of:
    Dave K. Byers, Administrative Director
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 414
    Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3327
    Phone: (602) 452-3301
    [email protected]
    Attachments
    Aaron Nash
    New Member
    Posts:7 New Member

    --
    16 Oct 2018 02:16 PM
    Comment filed on behalf of:
    Hon. Timothy Ryan, Juvenile Court Presiding Judge
    Maricopa County Superior Court

    Hon. Chris DeRose, Clerk of Superior Court for Maricopa County
    620 W. Jackson St.
    Phoenix, AZ 85003
    (602) 506-2309
    [email protected]

    The petitioners of R-18-0005 file this comment supporting the consensus version of the rules submitted by David Byers on September 27, 2018. The AOC’s Juvenile Records Access Workgroup met twice to discuss and define appropriate levels of access to meet the needs of parties, the public, the legal community, agencies, the courts, and the clerks. We believe the workgroup achieved its goals with the consensus version that was presented.
    Topic is locked