|
| | 12/8/2022 |
| 1 CA-CR 22-0020 | STATE v. PEREZ AGUEDA | MEMORANDUM |
| | Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Cynthia J. Bailey, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 3/29/2022 |
| 1 CA-CV 19-0544 | TORRES, et al. v. JAI DINING | OPINION |
| | Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Maria Elena Cruz, Concur; David B. Gass, Concur
|
| | 1. Whether JAI Dining waived the issue of preemption by not raising it in the superior court.
2. Whether A.R.S. § 4-312(B) preempts Plaintiffs’ common law claims. |
|
| | 3/17/2022 |
| 1 CA-CR 20-0388-PRPC | STATE v. TAYLOR | MEMORANDUM |
| | Paul J. McMurdie; Cynthia J. Bailey; Lawrence F. Winthrop
|
| | |
|
| | 12/9/2021 |
| 1 CA-CV 19-0649-FC | LARCHICK v. POLLOCK | OPINION |
| | Jennifer B. Campbell, Author; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur; Samuel A. Thumma, Concur
|
| | 1. Whether the family court erred by entering a decree dissolving the parties’ marriage while retaining jurisdiction to decide property issues.
2. Whether the family court erred by precluding expert opinion valuation testimony on the basis that the expert had failed to follow all possible methodologies.
3. Whether the family court, after precluding Husband’s expert from testifying, erred by concluding there was no evidence that Wife’s business increased in value during the marriage.
4. Whether the family court erred by improperly placing the burden of proof on Husband to show a community interest in real property Wife’s LLC purchased during the marriage. |
|
| | 10/14/2021 |
| 1 CA-CR 20-0366 | STATE v. ENGLISH | MEMORANDUM |
| | Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Cynthia J. Bailey, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 10/14/2021 |
| 1 CA-CR 20-0487 | STATE v. ACOSTA | MEMORANDUM |
| | Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Cynthia J. Bailey, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 9/23/2021 |
| 1 CA-CR 20-0527 | STATE v. WATERS | MEMORANDUM |
| | Cynthia J. Bailey, Author; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 8/26/2021 |
| 1 CA-CV 20-0127 | CANAS, et al. v. BAY ENTERTAINMENT, et al. | OPINION |
| | Peter B. Swann, Author; Jennifer B. Campbell, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | 1. Does Arizona recognize a common law cause of action by civilians for misappropriation of name or likeness as a species of invasion of privacy?
2. Does A.R.S. § 12-761 preempt any such common law cause of action? |
|
| | 8/24/2021 |
| 1 CA-TX 20-0009 | MESQUITE POWER v. ADOR | OPINION |
| | Paul J. McMurdie, Author; Cynthia J. Bailey, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur
|
| | Whether the Department of Revenue's obligation to provide forms is a condition precedent excusing the taxpayer’s failure to submit its 2020 valuation timely.
|
|
| | 8/12/2021 |
| 1 CA-TX 20-0005 | BSI v. ADOT | OPINION |
| | Lawrence F. Winthrop, Author; Paul J. McMurdie, Concur; Cynthia J. Bailey, Concur
|
| | 1. Whether the tax court erred in concluding the term “based in” is ambiguous as used in A.R.S. § 28-8336.
2. Whether the tax court should have applied a “domiciliary analysis” to the definition of the term “based in” and applied a “totality of the circumstances” standard to that domiciliary analysis. |
|
|