JPR Banner
Home > Judicial Performance Reports > Judicial Decisions

Judicial Decisions

This search utility below is available for decisions filed with the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Division I.

Click here to search Court of Appeals, Division II.
Search filter ON - Top 1000 records found    Clear search filter
Judge: Timmer, Ann Scott
Search Decisions

12345678910...
7/10/2024   CV-21-0256-CQSTAKER&PARSON COMPANIES v SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

6/27/2024   CV-22-0290-PRSAN CARLOS v STATE et al/RESOLUTIONOPINION
 Kathryn H. King, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur

6/25/2024   CV-23-0233-PRROAF v REBUCK CONSULTING, et alOPINION
 Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

6/18/2024   CR-23-0029-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v KEVIN DUNBAROPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur in part; Dissent in part

6/18/2024   CV-23-0160-PRIN RE THE MARRIAGE OF QUIJADA/DOMINGUEZOPINION
 Clint Bolick, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Dissent; Kathryn H. King, Dissent

6/7/2024   CV-23-0176-PRDOVE MOUNTAIN, et al v ADOROPINION
 William Montgomery, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; John Pelander, Concur

6/3/2024   CV-23-0181-PRAMY SILVERMAN, et al. v ADESOPINION
 Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; John Pelander, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision

A.R.S. § 46-460(A) generally shields from public inspection all records maintained by the Arizona Department of Economic Security concerning abuse, exploitation, or neglect of vulnerable adults.  A “bona fide research” exception exists that permits the Department to release these records to researchers.  See § 46-460(D)(8).  We decide that investigative journalists can qualify as researchers under this exception.  We reason, in part, that categorically excluding journalists from this exception would raise serious freedom of speech and equal protection concerns under our state and federal constitutions.

5/31/2024   CR-23-0137-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v MANUEL DAVID PEREZ-GUTIERREZOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision

We adopt A.R.S. § 13-711(A)’s requirement that the trial court state on the record its reasons for imposing either consecutive or concurrent sentences, thereby obviating any conflict between the statute and Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.13. Accordingly, § 13-711(A) is constitutional because it does not usurp this Court’s exclusive authority over procedural rulemaking provided by article 6, section 5(5) of the Arizona Constitution.

5/2/2024   CR-23-0008-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v LARRY DEAN ANDERSONOPINION
 Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; James P. Beene, Dissent; William Montgomery, Dissent

5/2/2024   CV-23-0208-PRARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY v RICHER, et alOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

12345678910...