Home > Performance Reports > Judicial Reports

Judicial Reports

Commission number votes may vary based upon abstentions. Voting abstentions are procedural matters within the
Commission and should not be viewed in any way as a negative factor with respect to a judge's performance.

  
Pima County Voters Only

Hon. Charles V. Harrington
Pima County Superior Court

Bench: Civil

Appointed: 1999
100% of the Commission Voted Judge Harrington
MEETS Judicial Performance Standards
27 Commissioners Voted 'Meets'
0 Commissioners Voted 'Does Not Meet'
 
Show Surveys from Prior Years
2018Attorney Surveys
Distributed: 135
Returned: 44
Score (See Footnote)
Juror Surveys
Distributed: 0
Returned: 0
Score (See Footnote)
Litigant Witness Surveys
Distributed: 103
Returned: 32
Score (See Footnote)
 Legal Ability 99%n/an/a
 Integrity 98%n/a98%
 Communication 94%n/a88%
 Temperament 92%n/a94%
 Admin Performance 95%n/a97%
 Admin Skills n/an/an/a
 Settlement Activities 96%n/an/a
FOOTNOTE:
Judges are evaluated on their judicial performance midway through their term and prior to their retention election. Beginning in 2022, their survey evaluation scores include midterm scores and retention scores. Newly appointed judges serve a two-year term and are evaluated prior to their retention election on their retention scores. The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "superior", "very good", or "satisfactory" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials or no survey responses were returned). The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information, as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.