Home > Performance Reports > Judicial Reports

Judicial Reports

Commission number votes may vary based upon abstentions. Voting abstentions are procedural matters within the
Commission and should not be viewed in any way as a negative factor with respect to a judge's performance.

  
Maricopa County Voters Only

Hon. Suzanne Marwil
Maricopa County Superior Court

Bench: Family

Appointed: 2018
100% of the Commission Voted Judge Marwil
MEETS Judicial Performance Standards
33 Commissioners Voted 'Meets'
0 Commissioners Voted 'Does Not Meet'
 
Show Surveys from Prior Years
2020Attorney Surveys
Distributed: 181
Returned: 50
Score (See Footnote)
Juror Surveys
Distributed: 0
Returned: 0
Score (See Footnote)
Litigant Witness Surveys
Distributed: 420
Returned: 51
Score (See Footnote)
 Legal Ability 95%n/an/a
 Integrity 94%n/a96%
 Communication 87%n/a90%
 Temperament 92%n/a93%
 Admin Performance 99%n/a91%
 Settlement Activities 97%n/an/a
FOOTNOTE:
Judges are evaluated on their judicial performance midway through their term and prior to their retention election. Beginning in 2022, their survey evaluation scores include midterm scores and retention scores. Newly appointed judges serve a two-year term and are evaluated prior to their retention election on their retention scores. The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "superior", "very good", or "satisfactory" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials or no survey responses were returned). The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information, as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.