Judicial Report

Home > Performance Reports > Judicial Reports

Judicial Reports

Commission number votes may vary based upon abstentions. Voting abstentions are procedural matters within the
Commission and should not be viewed in any way as a negative factor with respect to a judge's performance.


Hon. Steven J. Fuller	2018 Attorney Survey Responses
Key: SU = Superior VG = Very Good SA = Satisfactory PO = Poor UN = Unsatisfactory

	UN		PO		SA		VG		SU		Mean	Total	No Resp
1. Legal Ability	Num.	Pct.	Num.	Pct.	Num.	Pct.	Num.	Pct.	Num.	Pct.
20180093. Legal reasoning ability	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	2	50%	1	25%	3.00	4	0
20180094. Knowledge of substantive law	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	2	67%	1	33%	3.33	3	0
20180095. Knowledge of rules of evidence	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	2	67%	1	33%	3.33	3	0
20180096. Knowledge of rules of procedure	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	1	33%	2	67%	3.67	3	0
Category Total	0	0%	0	0%	1	8%	7	54%	5	38%	3.31	13
2. Integrity
20180097. Basic fairness and impartiality	0	0%	0	0%	2	50%	1	25%	1	25%	2.75	4	0
20180098. Equal treatment regardless of race	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180099. Equal treatment regardless of gender	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180100. Equal treatment regardless of religion	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180101. Equal treatment regardless of national origin	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180102. Equal treatment regardless of disability	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180103. Equal treatment regardless of age	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
20180104. Equal treatment regardless of sexual orientation	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	1	33%	2	67%	3.67	3	0
20180105. Equal treatment regardless of economic status	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	1	25%	2	50%	3.25	4	0
Category Total	0	0%	0	0%	9	26%	9	26%	17	49%	3.23	35
3. Communication
20180106. Clear and logical oral communications and directions	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	4	100%	4.00	4	0
20180107. Clear and logical written decisions	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	1	50%	1	50%	3.50	2	0
20180108. Gave all parties an adequate opportunity to be heard	0	0%	0	0%	1	33%	2	67%	0	0%	2.67	3	0
Category Total	0	0%	0	0%	1	11%	3	33%	5	56%	3.44	9
4. Temperament
20180109. Understanding and compassion	0	0%	0	0%	3	75%	1	25%	0	0%	2.25	4	0
20180110. Dignified	0	0%	1	25%	0	0%	2	50%	1	25%	2.75	4	0
20180111. Courteous	0	0%	0	0%	2	50%	2	50%	0	0%	2.50	4	0
20180112. Conduct that promoted public confidence in the court and judge''s ability	0	0%	1	25%	0	0%	2	50%	1	25%	2.75	4	0
20180113. Patient	0	0%	1	25%	3	75%	0	0%	0	0%	1.75	4	0
Category Total	0	0%	3	15%	8	40%	7	35%	2	10%	2.40	20
5. Admin Performance
20180114. Punctual in conducting proceedings	0	0%	1	25%	2	50%	0	0%	1	25%	2.25	4	0
20180115. Maintained proper control over courtroom	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	0	0%	3	75%	3.50	4	0
20180116. Prompt in making rulings and rendering decisions	0	0%	0	0%	1	33%	0	0%	2	67%	3.33	3	0
20180117. Was prepared for the proceedings	0	0%	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	3	75%	3.75	4	0
20180118. Efficient management of the calendar	0	0%	0	0%	1	25%	0	0%	3	75%	3.50	4	0
Category Total	0	0%	1	5%	5	26%	1	5%	12	63%	3.26	19