Home 2012 Judicial Performance Reports

2012 Judicial Performance Reports

Pima Superior Court Reports
Judge Commission Vote Judicial Report Assignment/Bench Serving Since

Adam, Karen S.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Juvenile) 2010

Aragon, Gus

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Juvenile) 2006

Bernini, Deborah

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Criminal) 1997

Bryson, Kyle A.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 2010

Cornelio, Carmine

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Family) 2002

Eikleberry, Jane L.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Criminal) 2001

Fields, Richard S.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Criminal) 1997

Gordon, Richard

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 2009

Hantman, Howard

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Family) 1994

Kearney, Jan E.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 2001

Lee, Kenneth

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 1997

Miller, Leslie B.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Juvenile) 1985

Miller, Michael

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Criminal) 2002

Rash, Scott H.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 2010

Simmons, Sarah R.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Other) 2006

Staring, Christopher P.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Juvenile) 2010

Tang, Paul E.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Criminal) 2001

Villarreal, Stephen C.

Full Bio    

Meets JPR Standards View Pima (Civil) 1998

NOTE:
Judges are evaluated on their judicial performance midway through their term and prior to their retention election. Beginning in 2022, their survey evaluation scores include midterm scores and retention scores. Newly appointed judges serve a two-year term and are evaluated prior to their retention election on their retention scores. The score is the percentage of all evaluators who rated the judge "superior", "very good", or "satisfactory" in each of the Commission's evaluation categories. Depending on the assignment, a judge may not have responses in certain categories, indicated by N/A (for example, some judicial assignments do not require jury trials or no survey responses were returned). The JPR Commission votes "Yes" or "No" on whether a judge "MEETS" Judicial Performance Standards, based on the statistical information, as well as any other information submitted by the public or the judge. Further information on the judges and justices can be found at each court's website.

Back to Top