| | 5/2/2013 |
| SB-12-0039 | In the Matter of Rachel R. Alexander | OPINION |
| | Ann A. Scott Timmer, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur |
|
| | 4/17/2013 |
| SB-12-0040 | In the Matter of RICHARD B. JOHNSON | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 4/15/2013 |
| CR-10-0052 | STATE OF ARIZONA v ERIC BOYSTON | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Diane M. Johnsen, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-503 (providing that voluntary, temporary intoxication “is not a defense for any criminal act or requisite state of mind”) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 6 (right to confront evidence and to present a complete defense), U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment), or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process, equal protection). Holding A.R.S. § 13-756(A) (providing for abuse of discretion appellate review in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). |
|
| | 4/4/2013 |
| CR-10-0362 | STATE OF ARIZONA v EDWARD JAMES ROSE | OPINION |
| | John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 21-202(B)(3) (requiring dismissal of prospective jurors “not currently capable of understanding the English language”) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 6 (right to jury trial) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process, equal protection). Holding A.R.S. § 13-752(R) (authorizing victim impact statements in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(10) (providing as an aggravating circumstance in a capital case that the victim “was an on duty peace officer who was killed in the course of performing the officer’s official duties and the defendant knew, or should have known, that the murdered person was a peace officer”) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend 14 (due process, equal protection). Holding A.R.S. § 13-756(A) (providing for abuse of discretion appellate review in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). |
|
| | 4/4/2013 |
| CR-12-0238 | STATE OF ARIZONA v DAVID JAMES YONKMAN | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 3/13/2013 |
| CR-10-0196 | STATE OF ARIZONA v STEVEN JOHN PARKER | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Samuel A. Thumma, Concur |
|
| | 3/12/2013 |
| CV-12-0102 | ROBERT BAKER v UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS HEALTHCARE et al | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Michael J. Brown, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 12-2604 constitutional as not contrary to U.S. Const. amend. 14, § 1 (equal protection and due process); Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 13 (privileges and immunities); Ariz. Const. art. 18, § 6 (anti-abrogation); Ariz. Const. art. 4, pt. 2, § 19 (prohibition against special laws); and Ariz. Const. art. 3 (separation of powers). |
|
| | 3/6/2013 |
| CR-12-0018 | STATE OF ARIZONA v AUSTIN JAMES BONFIGLIO | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur, Peter J. Cahill, Concur |
|
| | 3/5/2013 |
| CV-12-0241 | STAGECOACH TRAILS MHC v CITY OF BENSON et al | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 3/5/2013 |
| CV-12-0149 | FRANK HOFFMAN v HON. CHANDLER/STATE | OPINION |
| | Ann A. Scott Timmer, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 3/1/2013 |
| CV-12-0007 | In re the ESTATE OF MARY A. RILEY | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Peter J. Cahill, Concur |
|
| | 3/1/2013 |
| CV-12-0120 | In re the ESTATE OF FRED N. KIRKES | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Michael J. Brown, Concur |
|
| | 2/22/2013 |
| CV-12-0211 | JAMES C. SELL v HON. GAMA/SQUIRE & COMPANY et al | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Peter J. Eckerstrom, Concur, Garye L. Vasquez, Concur |
|
| | 1/17/2013 |
| CV-12-0273 | REP ANDREW TOBIN et al v HON REA et al | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 1/17/2013 |
| CV-12-0286 | QUALITY EDUCATION v KEN BENNETT/THOMAS HORNE | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 1/11/2013 |
| CR-10-0085 | STATE OF ARIZONA v MANUEL OVANTE, JR. | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 1/9/2013 |
| CV-11-0358 | RAE ANN RUMERY et al v MARIA BAIER/DOUG DUCEY | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Virginia C. Kelly, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 37-527, which diverts up to ten percent of certain trust land proceeds to a management fund, unconstitutional because Article 10, Section 7(A) of Arizona’s Constitution requires such monies to be deposited into a permanent fund to serve the purpose for which the land was granted. |
|
| | 1/9/2013 |
| CR-09-0199 | STATE OF ARIZONA v SHAWN RYAN GRELL | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann A. Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 1/7/2013 |
| CV-12-0272 | SAVE OUR VOTE et al v. BENNETT/OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE SUPPORTING C-03-2012 | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Patricia A. Orozco, Concur |
|
| | 12/7/2012 |
| CR-10-0358 | STATE v. FABIO EVELIO GOMEZ | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Donn Kessler, Concur |
|
| | 11/15/2012 |
| CV-12-0277 | JILL KENNEDY v JOSEPH LODGE et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 9/12/2012 |
| WC-11-0001 | RE WATER RIGHTS TO GILA/LITTLE COLORADO | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Lawrence F. Winthrop, Concur |
|
| | 9/7/2012 |
| CV-11-0351 | COLEMAN v. CITY OF MESA et al | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 8/17/2012 |
| CV-12-0039 | ESCAMILLA v CUELLO/CABRERA | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 38-201(C) (requiring that a candidate for state, county, city, town or precinct office be able to speak, write, and read the English language) constitutional because there is no constitutional right to seek office and the language requirement reflects a legitimate legislative concern. |
|
| | 8/17/2012 |
| CR-10-0177 | STATE OF ARIZONA v GILBERT MARTINEZ | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/17/2012 |
| CR-10-0138 | STATE OF ARIZONA v RONNIE LOVELLE JOSEPH | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 8/16/2012 |
| CR-09-0224 | STATE OF ARIZONA v RODNEY EUGENE HARDY | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 8/15/2012 |
| CR-09-0322 | STATE v. PETE J. VANWINKLE | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/14/2012 |
| CR-09-0342 | STATE v. ISIAH PATTERSON | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/8/2012 |
| CV-12-0221 | JILL KENNEDY v JOSEPH LODGE et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; A. John Pelander, Concur; Rober M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 7/26/2012 |
| CR-09-0266 | STATE OF ARIZONA v SCOTT DOUGLAS NORDSTROM | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author, Rebecca White Berch, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur, Maurice Portley, Concur |
|
| | 7/11/2012 |
| CV-11-0115 | JOHN F HOGAN v WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK et al | OPINION |
| | This Opinion Amends the Opinion filed on May 18, 2012.
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 7/11/2012 |
| CV-11-0132 | JOHN HOGAN v WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK et al | OPINION |
| | This Opinion Amends the Opinion filed on May 18, 2012.
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 7/10/2012 |
| CR-09-0077 | STATE OF ARIZONA v DALE SHAWN HAUSNER | OPINION |
| | Scott Bales, Author, Rebecca White Berch, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-756(A) (providing for abuse of discretion appellate review in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(13) (cold and calculated manner aggravator) constitutional because of a limiting instruction and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) . |
|
| | 7/9/2012 |
| CV-11-0273 | AARON ENGLER v GULF INTERSTATE ENGINEERING INC | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 7/3/2012 |
| CV-11-0072 | CNL HOTELS AND RESORTS et al v. MARICOPA COUNTY | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/3/2012 |
| CR-11-0180 | STATE OF ARIZONA v. NELSON IVAN BOTEO-FLORES | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Scott Bales, Concur, A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 6/27/2012 |
| CR-11-0314 | STATE OF ARIZONA v. PHIL GUTIERREZ | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur, Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur, W. Scott Bales, Concur, Robert M. Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 6/27/2012 |
| CV-11-0344 | MARIO W. et al v HON. KAIPIO/STATE et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 8-238 (requiring juveniles charged with violations of certain offenses to submit tissue samples for DNA testing) constitutional under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution; holding that before adjudication, the State may extract a DNA profile from the sample only if the juvenile absconds or fails to appear as required by law or court order. |
|
| | 5/31/2012 |
| CV-11-0324-CQ | AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO v SABINE SHARP | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/31/2012 |
| CR-11-0282-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v GARY WAYNE GIPSON JR | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/15/2012 |
| CV-11-0291-PR | STATE ex rel HORNE v AUTOZONE | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/4/2012 |
| CV-11-0308-PR | BT CAPITAL v TD SERVICE CO et al/POINT CENTER | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/20/2012 |
| CV-11-0313-SA | AZ REDISTRICTING/MATHIS v BREWER/AZ SENATE/PEARCE | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/13/2012 |
| CV-11-0198 | ELIZABETH WALSH et al v ADVANCED CARDIAC | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/12/2012 |
| CR-09-0343 | STATE OF ARIZONA v BRAD LEE NELSON | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(9) (age-of-victim aggravator) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const amend. 14 (due process, equal protection). Holding A.R.S. § 13-756(A) (providing for abuse of discretion appellate review in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). |
|
| | 4/11/2012 |
| CR-11-0127 | STATE OF ARIZONA v PATRICK M FERRERO | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/9/2012 |
| CR-11-0083-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v PETE J VANWINKLE | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/6/2012 |
| CV-11-0150-PR | CITY OF TUCSON v STATE OF ARIZONA et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/6/2012 |
| CV-11-0269-PR | SOURCECORP INC v D NORCUTT/S NORCUTT | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 3/27/2012 |
| CR-09-0341-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v JAMES GRANVIL WALLACE | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 3/22/2012 |
| CR-09-0218-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v BENJAMIN BERNAL COTA | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 21-202(B)(3) (requiring dismissal of prospective jurors not capable of speaking English) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 6 (right to jury trial) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process, equal protection). Holding A.R.S. § 13-752(R) (authorizing victim impact statements in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment). Holding A.R.S. § 13-756(A) (providing for abuse of discretion appellate review in capital cases) constitutional and not violative of U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) or U.S. Const. amend. 14 (due process). |
|
| | 2/23/2012 |
| CV-11-0186-PR | ERA C NUNEZ v PROFESSIONAL TRANSIT MANAGEMENT | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 2/6/2012 |
| CV-11-0083 | PAULINE COSPER v HON. REA/MORA | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 12/21/2011 |
| CV-11-0028-PR | CLIFFORD J OCHSER v GERARD FUNK/ANTHONY CRUZ | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 12/21/2011 |
| CR-09-0253-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v JAHMARI ALI MANUEL | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 12/20/2011 |
| CR-11-0040-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v DOUGLAS LEE EDDINGTON | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 11/30/2011 |
| CV-10-0300-PR | ESTATE OF BRADEN/GABALDON v STATE et al | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Dissent; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur in the Dissent |
|
| | 11/23/2011 |
| CV-10-0362 | MARTIN RIVERA-LONGORIA v HON. SLAYTON/STATE/ROZEMA | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 11/18/2011 |
| CV-11-0091-CQ | JULIA VASQUEZ v SAXON MORTGAGE INC et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 11/14/2011 |
| CV-11-0264 | FRANKLIN BRUCE ROSS v KEN BENNETT et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 8/4/2011 |
| JC-11-0001 | In the Matter of HONORABLE THEODORE ABRAMS | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 7/13/2011 |
| CR-09-0095-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v SCOTT ALAN LEHR | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Patricia A Orozco, Concur |
|
| | 7/8/2011 |
| CV-10-0405-SA | ADAMS/PEARCE v COMMISSION ON APPELLATE COURT et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Robert M Brutinel, Dissent in part; A. John Pelander, Concur in the Dissent; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur in part; A. John Pelander, Concur in part |
|
| | 7/1/2011 |
| CV-10-0324-PR | AMERICAN ASPHALT v CMX LLC/CMX GROUP INC | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/1/2011 |
| CR-90-0356-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v JAMES LYNN STYERS | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Dissent; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 6/30/2011 |
| CV-11-0006 | ALFRED ALBANO et al v SHEA HOMES/J F SHEA CO INC | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 6/29/2011 |
| CV-10-0397-PR | SUE LYNN CRAIG v ROGER THOMAS CRAIG | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 6/10/2011 |
| CR-10-0309-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v MICHAEL QUINCY HUMMONS | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 5/19/2011 |
| CR-10-0315-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v LAQUINN ANTHONY FISHER | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 5/12/2011 |
| CR-10-0306-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v WEST | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/12/2011 |
| CV-10-0339-PR | DESERT MOUNTAIN PROP v LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INS | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/6/2011 |
| CR-08-0025-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v CLARENCE WAYNE DIXON | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 5/6/2011 |
| CR-09-0019-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v WAYNE BENOIT PRINCE | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-752(K) (providing for the impaneling of a new jury if the former jury cannot reach a verdict during the first penalty phase) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 25 (ex post facto clause), Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. art. 1 § 10 (ex post facto clause), US Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause). Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause). |
|
| | 4/29/2011 |
| CV-10-0327-PR | MOREHART/DUFFY v HON. BARTON/STATE/MILLER | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur |
|
| | 4/21/2011 |
| CV-10-0285-PR | JESUS GUTIERREZ v ICA/MASTERSON et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/8/2011 |
| CR-09-0133-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v DONALD DAVID DELAHANTY | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 4/7/2011 |
| CV-10-0196-PR | LEVERAGED LAND CO et al v MICHAEL W HODGES et al | OPINION |
| | Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 4/5/2011 |
| CV-10-0230-PR | AMY YOUNG v KENNETH L BECK et ux | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 3/24/2011 |
| CV-10-0292-PR | LETTIE PRESTON et al v KINDRED HOSPITALS et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 3/3/2011 |
| CV-10-0218-PR | CITY OF PEORIA/PHOENIX v BRINKS HOME SECURITY | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 3/1/2011 |
| CR-10-0154-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL REGENOLD | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; A. John Pelander, Dissent; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 2/16/2011 |
| CR-10-0242-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v LOUIE THOMAS MACHADO | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 1/26/2011 |
| CR-10-0017-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v CESAR MONTES | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding that the enactment of SB 1449 (providing for the retroactive application of SB 1145, a 2006 law concerning the defense of justification in criminal cases) was a constitutional exercise of legislative authority and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 3 (separation of powers), U.S. Const. arts. 1-3. (separation of powers). |
|
| | 1/21/2011 |
| CV-10-0189-PR | PLANNING GROUP et al v LAKE MATHEWS MINERAL et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 1/20/2011 |
| CV-10-0026-PR | LUIS BALLESTEROS et al v AMERICAN STANDARD et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Peter B Swann, Concur |
|
| | 1/18/2011 |
| CV-10-0172-PR | ESTATE OF MADDISON DESELA v PRESCOTT UNIFIED et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 1/13/2011 |
| CR-10-0211-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v TROY JASON LEWIS | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 1/10/2011 |
| CV-10-0092-PR | IN RE NICKOLAS S. | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Joseph W Howard, Concur; A. John Pelander, Special Concurrence |
|
| | 12/22/2010 |
| CR-09-0339-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v JOSEPH WESLEY GOMEZ | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur |
|
| | 12/16/2010 |
| SB-10-0036-D | In the Matters of JEFFREY PHILLIPS/ROBERT ARENTZ | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Jon W Thompson, Concur; Sheldon H Weisberg, Concur in part, Dissent in part |
|
| | 12/8/2010 |
| CR-10-0019-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v BRAD ALAN BOWSHER | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; James A Soto, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-903(A) (calculation of periods of probation) constitutional despite retroactivity claims under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). |
|
| | 12/2/2010 |
| CV-10-0102-PR | MARIANNE WALDOW et al v JAMES LAPORTA | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 11/30/2010 |
| CR-09-0171-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v MIKE PETER GALLARDO | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). Holding A.R.S. §§ 13-751 to -759 (capital sentencing scheme) constitutional under U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment) and U.S. Const. amend 14 (due process). |
|
| | 11/15/2010 |
| CR-10-0089 | STATE OF ARIZONA v JESUS HUMBERTO SOTO | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 9/27/2010 |
| CV-10-0278-AP/EL | PETERSEN/BURK v PURCELL/COVEY et al | MEMORANDUM |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 9/2/2010 |
| CV-10-0205-AP/EL | McLAUGHLIN/UNITED FOOD v BENNETT/SOS BALLOT et al | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 8/19/2010 |
| CV-10-0096-CQ | FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL v COLIN FRIEDMAN et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 8/17/2010 |
| CV-10-0197-AP/EL | GARY GRIFFITH v BACA/DICKERSON/GRAHAM COUNTY et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/9/2010 |
| CR-08-0164-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v GARY WAYNE SNELLING | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (Cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends 5, 14 (due process). |
|
| | 8/6/2010 |
| CV-10-0183 | MICHAEL McCLUNG v BENNETT/JOE SWEENEY et al | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/5/2010 |
| CV-09-0297-PR | IN RE MH-2008-000867 | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/5/2010 |
| CV-09-0317-PR | RICHARD/MARCIA GRAND v NACCHIO et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Peter B Swann, Concur |
|
| | 8/3/2010 |
| CV-09-0230-PR | JAMES TARRON et ux v BOWEN MACHINE & FABRICATING | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 8/3/2010 |
| CR-07-0384-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v DEREK DON CHAPPELL | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process). |
|
| | 8/2/2010 |
| CV-10-0179-AP/EL | PACION/BOWIE v BOB THOMAS et al/HUPPENTHAL et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/30/2010 |
| CV-10-0017-PR | CARDONA et al v HON. KREAMER/LAC VIEUX et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/12/2010 |
| CR-07-0139 | STATE OF ARIZONA v BRIAN ALLEN WOMBLE | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) (cruelty aggravator) constitutional based on jury instruction under U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process) and U.S. Const. amend. 8 (punishment not applied arbitrarily). |
|
| | 7/8/2010 |
| CV-09-0267-PR | KRISTEN JOHNSON et al v ADOT | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
|
| | 7/7/2010 |
| CR-09-0333-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v ADAM SCOTT KING | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/2/2010 |
| CV-10-0028-PR | KADLEC/HOWELL v DORSEY | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 7/1/2010 |
| CR-08-0098-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v JOSHUA IDLEFONSO VILLALOBOS | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause) and U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause). |
|
| | 6/22/2010 |
| CR-06-0220-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v SHAWN PATRICK LYNCH | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-752(K) (providing for the impaneling of a new jury if the former jury cannot reach a verdict during the first penalty phase) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 10 (double jeopardy clause), U.S. Const. amend. 5 (double jeopardy clause). |
|
| | 6/16/2010 |
| CR-08-0038-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v AARON BRIAN GUNCHES | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 6/14/2010 |
| CR-06-0061-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER ALLEN HARGRAVE | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) vague but constitutional because of a clarifying jury instruction and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amend. 8 (punishment not applied arbitrarily). Holding A.R.S. § 13-757(A) (death penalty by lethal injection) constitutional and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 15 (cruel and unusual punishment), U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment). |
|
| | 6/7/2010 |
| CV-09-0285-PR | JOSE CARRILLO v HON. HOUSER/PHX CITY PROSECUTOR | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Author; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 5/3/2010 |
| CV-09-0273-PR | MONICA LIPS/WALTER LIPS v SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 3/18/2010 |
| CR-07-0438-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v ALFREDO LUCERO GARCIA | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 3/11/2010 |
| CR-08-0116-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v LEROY D CROPPER | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Philip Hall, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-752(K) (providing for the impaneling of a new jury if the first jury cannot reach a verdict during the penalty phase) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 25 (ex post facto clause) and U.S. Const. art. 1 § 10 (ex post facto clause). |
|
| | 3/4/2010 |
| CR-09-0205-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v TRACIE RENEE GEESLIN | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur |
|
| | 2/24/2010 |
| CR-07-0301-AP | STATE OF ARIZONA v RYAN WESLEY KUHS | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
Constitutionality Decision
Holding A.R.S. § 13-757(A) (death penalty by lethal injection) constitutional and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 15 (cruel and unusual punishment) and U.S. Const. amend. 8 (cruel and unusual punishment). |
|
| | 2/19/2010 |
| WC-07-0003-IR | In Re: GILA RIVER SYSTEM | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Ann A Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 2/19/2010 |
| WC-07-0001-IR | GILA RIVER GENERAL ADJUDICATION | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Ann A Scott Timmer, Concur |
|
| | 2/12/2010 |
| CR-09-0189-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v ANGEL ELEUTERIO DIAZ | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
|
| | 2/12/2010 |
| CV-09-0117-PR | FLAGSTAFF AFFORDABLE HOUSING v DESIGN ALLIANCE INC | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 2/8/2010 |
| CV-09-0174-PR | STATE ex rel ICA v TOMMY WORD/PACIFIC MECHANICAL | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 1/25/2010 |
| CV-09-0042-PR | MEYER TURKEN et al v PHIL GORDON et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 1/15/2010 |
| CR-09-0188-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v JOSE SALVADOR GUILLEN | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 1/8/2010 |
| SB-09-0053-M | In the Matter of ALEJANDRO LAZCANO | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 1/7/2010 |
| CR-09-0179-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v FRANK R MALDONADO | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 12/8/2009 |
| CR-08-0368-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v ROBERT EUGENE ALLEN | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 12/8/2009 |
| CR-09-0087-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v BASILIO SOLIZ | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 12/4/2009 |
| CR-08-0363-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v MARK ALLEN FREENEY | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur |
|
| | 10/29/2009 |
| CV-09-0036 | DAVID LAKE v CITY OF PHOENIX et al | OPINION |
| | W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 2/14/2008 |
| CV-07-0251-PR | DALE JOSEPH FUSHEK v STATE OF ARIZONA | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 11/30/2007 |
| WC-07-0002-IR | IN RE IN RE THE GENERAL ADJUDICATION OF ALL RIGHTS | OPINION |
| | Michael D. Ryan, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 2/9/2006 |
| WC-02-0003-IR | GILA RIVER GENERAL ADJUDICATION | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 2/24/2005 |
| CV-04-0146-PR | SAFEWAY INSURANCE v PETER A GUERRERO et al | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Charles E Jones, Concur; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 2/13/2004 |
| CV-03-0110-PR | CLARK KERR et al v M KILLIAN/AZ DEPT OF REVENUE | OPINION |
| | Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Charles E Jones, Concur; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 5/20/2003 |
| CV-02-0233-PR | JEFFREY L. ANDREWS vs LESLIE W. BLAKE/MOON VALLEY | OPINION |
| | A. John Pelander, Author; Charles E Jones, Concur; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; J William Brammer Jr., Concur |
|
| | 5/19/2003 |
| CV-02-0435-PR | DUANE LYNN vs HON. PETER REINSTEIN/RICHARD GLASSEL | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Charles E Jones, Concur; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|
| | 10/11/2002 |
| CV-02-0215-PR | STEVE MAY vs HON. COLLEEN McNALLY/BETSEY BAYLESS | OPINION |
| | Rebecca White Berch, Author; Charles E Jones, Concur; Ruth V. McGregor, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur |
|