| Case Title |
Case No. |
Additional Information |
| State of Arizona v Edward Littleton McCauley |
CR-20-0031-AP |
Oral Argument to be held on 10/29/2024
Case Summary not yet available
|
| State of Arizona v Ian Mitcham |
CR-23-0236-PR
|
Oral Argument to be held on 09/26/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 05/07/2024, as to this rephrased issue: “Did the Court of Appeals err in reversing the trial court’s suppression order?”
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-23-0014
|
| Centerpoint v Commonwealth |
CV-23-0164-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 09/24/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 05/07/2024,
as to both issues. However, the first issue is rephrased as follows:
“In this first-party title insurance case, the insured lenders stipulated in a Morris agreement that their deeds of trust on the property were inferior to competing mechanic’s liens, and to the amount the lien claimants would receive from the sale of the property to satisfy their liens. The insurer does not challenge these stipulations but contends there is no coverage because the insureds were fully repaid. Can the insurer contest coverage for the insured lenders’ title insurance claims based on policy provisions stating that the insurer’s liability for loss or damage shall not exceed the indebtedness owed to the insured and stating that there is no coverage for title defects or liens resulting in no loss to the insured ?”
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0039
|
| State of Arizona v Giovani Fuster Melendez |
CR-23-0215-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 09/24/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 05/07/2024
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-20-0066
|
| Mesa/Williams v Hon. Ryan/Rogers |
CV-23-0284-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 09/17/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 05/07/2024, as to this rephrased issue:
“Did the plaintiff’s notice of claim comply with A.R.S. § 12-821.01(A) by offering to settle the matter for $1,000,000 or the applicable policy limits, whichever is greater?”
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-SA-23-0154
|
| State Farm Automobile v Jacey Lee Orlando |
CV-23-0228-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 09/17/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 05/07/2024
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0447
|
| State of Arizona v Christopher Michael Montoya |
CR-22-0106-AP |
Oral Argument held on 06/13/2024
Case Summary
|
| Lisa Gilpin v Hon. Harris/Marcos Martinez |
CR-23-0252-PR |
Oral Argument held on 06/13/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 04/02/2024 as to this rephrased issue:
“Is a victim entitled to restitution when a defendant is adjudged guilty except insane?”
|
| San Diego Gas v ADOR, et al. |
CV-23-0283-PR |
Oral Argument held on 05/14/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 03/05/2024 as to the rephrased issue:
The court of appeals held that in determining the full cash value of all property owned by public utilities, the Arizona Department of Revenue can include the future costs of removing electric transmission and distribution property as accumulated depreciation under A.R.S. § 42-14154. Did the court incorrectly hold that such accumulated depreciation cannot reduce the full cash value of a plant in service to a negative number or offset the value of unrelated property?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-21-0008
|
| Francisco, et al v Affiliated Urologists, et al |
CV-23-0152-PR |
Oral Argument held on 04/18/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0701
|
| Vande Krol v Supersition/Benchmark |
CV-23-0211-PR |
Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/05/2023 as to this rephrased issue: Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that amendments to A.R.S. § 23-901.01 applied to retroactively to the claim of benefits in this case.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-IC-22-0046.
|
| Mark Gilmore, et al. v Kate Gallego, et al. |
CV-23-0130-PR |
Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 10/17/2023 as to these rephrased issues:
1. Does release time violate Petitioners’ free speech, free association, and Right to Work rights?
2. Do the challenged release time provisions violate the Gift Clause?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0049
|
| Rendon Quijada v. Pimienta Dominguez |
CV-23-0160-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/23/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0174-FC
|
| State of Arizona v Bennett Laquan Williams |
CR-23-0068-PR |
Oral Argument held on 01/16/2024
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023. In addition, the Court asks the parties to address an additional issue. Therefore, the parties should address these issues:
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by finding that a plea agreement is void when a marijuana-related conviction that was used to enhance its sentence has been expunged pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2862.
2. If so, may the State allege a different prior conviction to enhance the sentence?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0197 PRPC
|
| Mesquite v ADOR |
CV-23-0016-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/19/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0002
|
| Planned Parenthood et al v Kristin Mayes/Hazelrigg |
CV-23-0005-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0116
|
| State of Arizona v Kevin Dunbar |
CR-23-0029-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-21-0069
|
| CAO, et al v PFP Dorsey, et al |
CV-22-0228-PR |
Oral Argument on 11/21/2023
Case Summary
Petition and Cross-Petitions granted in part on 08/22/2023,
as to these rephrased questions:
1. Either on its face or as applied in this case, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 authorize the taking of private property for private use in violation of Article 2, § 17 of the Arizona Constitution?
2. If any common elements or units in a condominium are to be sold pursuant to a condominium termination agreement, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 require all the common elements and units to be part of that sale?
3. If a contract incorporates an unconstitutional statute by reference, are the terms of that statute enforceable as to the contracting parties?
4. If a condominium declaration incorporates a statute by reference, are subsequent statutory amendments incorporated into the agreement?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0275
|
| State of Arizona v Kevin Harry Moninger |
CR-21-0239-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/09/2022 **(OA on the Road- U of A, Tucson)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/23/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR-19-0353
|
| Staker & Parson Companies v Scottsdale Insurance Co |
CV-21-0256-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 4/14/2022
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022
|
| State v Preston Alton Strong |
CR-17-0201-AP |
Oral Argument held on 5/5/2020
Case Summary
|