| Monday, August 26, 2019 (Parts 5 of 5) - Rules
|
| Tuesday, August 27, 2019 (Part 1 of 1) - Motions
|
| Tuesday, August 27, 2019 (Part 1 of 1) - Petitions for Review
|
|
|
| NOTE: Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
|
|
|
| TRISHA A. v DCS/L.A./L.A.
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0178-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 8/15/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 4/16/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 2/5/2019 on the issue of whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a parent’s burden of demonstrating good cause does not include providing evidence of a meritorious defense on a motion to set aside a severance order following a Rule 64(C) acceleration of the severance hearing?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-JV 17-0126
|
|
|
| GILBERT AGUIRRE JR v ICA/CITY OF GOODYEAR et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0001-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 8/15/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 6/4/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 4/30/2019, only as to the issue rephrased as follows: Did the court of appeals err in holding that Aguirre was not required to challenge the sufficiency of the findings in the ICA proceedings to preserve it for appeal?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-IC 17-0017
|
|
|
| BRUSH & NIB et al v CITY OF PHOENIX
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0176-PR
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 1/22/2019
|
Case
Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 11/20/2018
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 16-0602
|
|
|
| CITY OF PHOENIX et al v ORBITZ WORLDWIDE et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0275-PR
|
| Oral Argument held on 6/4/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Review granted as to the following issues rephrased on April 3, 2019: Did the court of appeals err in its rulings: (a) affirming partial summary judgment and holding that the OTCs are “brokers” under Model City Tax Code (“MCTC”) § 444 and therefore their service fees are subject to municipal taxation [Petition]; (b) reversing partial summary judgment and holding that because the OTCs are not “hotels,” they are not subject to taxation under MCTC § 447 [Cross-Petition]; and (c) reversing the superior court’s ruling that the Cities may not assess tax, penalties, and interest for tax years before 2013 [Petition].
|
| Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case Nos. 1 CA-TX 16-0016 and 1 CA-TX 16-0018
|
|
|
| STATE v JOHN MICHAEL ALLEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0556-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v SAMMANTHA LUCILLE REBECCA ALLEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0368-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v BOBBY RAY CARTER JR
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0508-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 9/20/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 4/30/2019, only as to the issues rephrased as follows: Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that (1) theft is a lesser-included offense of theft as a means of transportation, thus giving rise to impermissible double punishments; (2) theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery, thus giving rise to impermissible multiple punishments; and (3) a more severely-penalized offense can be a lesser-included offense of a less-severely-penalized offense for multiple-punishment purposes?
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No 2 CA-CR 17-0149
|
|
|
| STATE v ALAN MATTHEW CHAMPAGNE
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0425-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 8/7/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 4/9/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v DAVID LEE GREEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0537-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 9/26/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0208
|
|
|
| STATE v CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0377-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 12/10/2018
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/6/2018
|
Case
Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 12/18/2018
|
|
|
| STATE v JAMES CLAYTON JOHNSON
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-16-0261-AP
|
| Oral Argument held on 6/6/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v PHILIP JOHN MARTIN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0380-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 8/9/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 5/9/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted as to this issue only: “Was the prosecution barred by double jeopardy from re-trying Appellant for first degree murder after a conviction of second degree murder in a prior trial?” on 3/20/2019
|
| Opinion and Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR 16-0551
|
|
|
| STATE v JAMES ERIN McKINNEY
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0362-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 9/27/2018
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/6/2018
|
| Case
Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v HECTOR SEBASTION NUNEZ-DIAZ
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0514-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 7/16/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 5/7/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 3/5/2019
|
| Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CR 16-0793
|
|
|
| STATE v THOMAS MICHAEL RILEY
|
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-15-0411-AP
|
Oral Argument to be held on 9/10/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v PRESTON ALTON STRONG
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0201-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v OSCAR PENA TRUJILLO
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0531-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 9/26/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019 as to 1. Was Trujillo entitled to a jury finding on M.A.C.’s age when that fact increased the mandatory minimum sentence affecting sex-offender registration? 2. Was the error harmless? 3. Should this Court reconsider the opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, (1992)
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0241
|
|
|
| NOTE: Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
|
|
|
|
|
| Notice: While the clerk's office maintains quality control measures on the information posted, some errors may occur. All posted information is subject to change or amendment.
|