| Tuesday, December 10, 2019 (Part 1 of 2) - Petitions for Review
|
|
|
|
|
| NOTE: Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
|
|
|
|
|
| WALTER ANSLEY et al v BANNER HEALTH NETWORK et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0077-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 11/20/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to issues 1 through 3 and this additional issue: Are attorney’s fees awardable under either A.R.S. § 12-341.01 or the private attorney general doctrine?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 17-0075
|
|
|
| APOLLO EDUCATION v NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0229-CQ
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Certified Question accepted on 10/29/2019
|
|
|
| BRUSH & NIB et al v CITY OF PHOENIX
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0176-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 9/16/2019
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 1/22/2019
|
Case
Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 11/20/2018
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 16-0602
|
|
|
| CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW CLEMENTS v HON. BERNINI/STATE
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0140-PR
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 10/29/2019
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 18-0288
|
| |
| ABELARDO CHAPARRO v DAVID C SHINN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0205-CQ
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 11/20/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Certified Question accepted on 9/24/2019
|
|
|
| EPHRAIM DABUSH et al v SEACRET DIRECT LLC et al |
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0200-PR |
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled |
| Case Summary not yet available |
| Petitions for Review granted on 11/19/2019 |
| Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 18-0288 |
| |
| CLAUDIA DUFF v HON. LEE/TUCSON POLICE et al |
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0128-PR |
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled |
| Case Summary not yet available |
| Petition for Review granted on 11/19/2019 |
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, No. 2 CA-SA 18-0058 |
| |
| HESHMAT DOROSTI v RECOVERY INNOVATIONS et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0136-PR
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 10/29/2019
|
| Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 16-0617
|
|
|
| E.H. v HON. SLAYTON/STATE et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0118-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 11/20/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019
|
| Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-SA 19-0004
|
|
|
| HWAL’BAY VA J ENTERPRISES INC v HON. JANTZEN/FOX
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0123-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 11/5/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019
|
|
|
| JOHNSON UTILITIES LLC v ARIZONA CORPORATION et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0105-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 11/5/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 8/29/2019
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-SA-18-0197
|
|
|
| SUSAN LAGERMAN v ARIZONA STATE RETIRMENT SYSTEM
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0101-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-CV 18-0014
|
|
|
| SAGUARO HEALING LLC v STATE OF ARIZONA et al
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0129-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019 as to Issue #B only
|
| Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-CV 18-0242
|
|
|
| SANDRA R./SERGIO C. v DCS/M.R./F.M./J.M.
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0057-PR
|
| Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Mother's Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to Issue #1 only.
|
| Appellant Sergio C.'s Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to Issue #2 only as rephrased: Does it violate due process to make the nexus finding in the best-interests inquiry?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-JV 18-0147
|
|
|
| MARIA ROSAS et al v ADES/CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0100-PR
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
Petition for Review granted on 10/29/2019 as to Issue #1 only, as rephrased:
Did the court of appeals misinterpret A.R.S. § 23-750(E), the agreements between the parties, and the Board’s decisions?
Did the court of appeals ignore factual evidence that supported the Board’s decisions?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Nos. 1 CA-UB 17-0385, 1 CA-UB 17-0414, 1 CA-UB 17-0415, 1 CA-UB 17-0416
|
|
|
| STEVEN SHOLEM v HONS. GASS/CONTES/MELISSA LANGEVIN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0149-PR
|
| Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
| Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019
|
|
|
| STATE v JOHN MICHAEL ALLEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0556-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v SAMMANTHA LUCILLE REBECCA ALLEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0368-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v BOBBY RAY CARTER JR
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0508-PR
|
| Oral Argument held on 9/20/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 4/30/2019, only as to the issues rephrased as follows: Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that (1) theft is a lesser-included offense of theft as a means of transportation, thus giving rise to impermissible double punishments; (2) theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery, thus giving rise to impermissible multiple punishments; and (3) a more severely-penalized offense can be a lesser-included offense of a less-severely-penalized offense for multiple-punishment purposes?
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No 2 CA-CR 17-0149
|
|
|
| STATE v ALAN MATTHEW CHAMPAGNE
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0425-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 8/7/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 4/9/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v DAVID LEE GREEN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0537-PR
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/26/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0208
|
|
|
| STATE v CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0377-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 12/10/2018
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/6/2018
|
Case
Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 12/18/2018
|
|
|
| STATE v JAMES CLAYTON JOHNSON
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-16-0261-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 8/23/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 6/6/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v BRYAN MITCHELL LIETZAU |
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0132-PR |
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled |
| Case Summary not yet available |
| Petition for Review granted on 11/19/2019 |
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, No. 2 CA-CR 18-0011 |
| |
| STATE v PHILIP JOHN MARTIN
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0380-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 8/9/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 5/9/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted as to this issue only: “Was the prosecution barred by double jeopardy from re-trying Appellant for first degree murder after a conviction of second degree murder in a prior trial?” on 3/20/2019
|
| Opinion and Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR 16-0551
|
|
|
| STATE v JAMES ERIN McKINNEY
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0362-AP
|
| Opinion issued on 9/27/2018
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/6/2018
|
| Case
Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v WILLIAM MIXTON |
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0276-PR |
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled |
| Case Summary not yet available |
| Petition for Review granted on 11/19/2019 |
| Cross-Petition for Review granted as to issue #1 only on 11/19/2019 |
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, No. 2 CA-CR 17-0217 |
| |
| STATE v HECTOR SEBASTION NUNEZ-DIAZ
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0514-PR
|
| Opinion issued on 7/16/2019
|
| Oral Argument held on 5/7/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 3/5/2019
|
| Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CR 16-0793
|
|
|
| STATE v RICHARD ALLEN REED
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0059-PR
|
| Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
| Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-CR 17-0620
|
|
|
| STATE v THOMAS MICHAEL RILEY
|
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-15-0411-AP
|
Oral Argument held on 9/10/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
|
| STATE v PRESTON ALTON STRONG
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0201-AP
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
|
| STATE v OSCAR PENA TRUJILLO
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0531-PR
|
| Oral
Argument
held on 9/26/2019
|
| Case Summary
|
|
Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019 as to 1. Was Trujillo entitled to a jury finding on M.A.C.’s age when that fact increased the mandatory minimum sentence affecting sex-offender registration? 2. Was the error harmless? 3. Should this Court reconsider the opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, (1992)
|
| Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0241
|
|
|
| STATE v LUIS ARMANDO VARGAS
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0071-PR
|
| Oral Argument not yet scheduled
|
| Case Summary not yet available
|
|
Petition for Review granted on 10/29/2019 as to Issue #2 as rephrased:
Did petitioner preserve fundamental error review for individual claims of prosecutorial misconduct by arguing that cumulative instances of prosecutorial misconduct constituted fundamental error?
Did the court of appeals properly rely on State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 (App. 2008)?
|
| Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, No. 2 CA-CR 16-0324
|
|
|
| JOHN TERRELL v RUBY TORRES
|
| Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0106-PR
|
| Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019
|
Case Summary
|
|
Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to these issues: 1. Did the court of appeals correctly interpret an in vitro fertilization agreement to permit respondent to use the subject embryos? 2. Did the court of appeals err by failing to remand for the trial court to balance the parties’ interests concerning disposition of the subject embryos?
|
| Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-CV 17-0617 FC
|
|
|
| NOTE: Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
|
|
|
|
|
| Notice: While the clerk's office maintains quality control measures on the information posted, some errors may occur. All posted information is subject to change or amendment.
|