| Case Title
|
Case No.
|
Additional Information
|
|
|
|
|
| AZ Free Enterprise Club et al v Katie Hobbs et al
|
CV-21-0304-AP/EL
|
Oral Argument to be held on 4/19/2022
Case Summary
|
| Lavelle Bridges v Nationstar Mortgage LLC
|
CV-21-0024-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 11/23/2021
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to these rephrased issues on 8/24/2021: 1. Did recording a notice of trustee sale accelerate the debt here as a matter of law? 2. Was the limitations period here tolled?
Opinion issued on issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 19-0556
|
| Robert Burns v Arizona Public Service Co et al
|
CV-21-0080-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 3/8/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to Issues #1 and #2 only on 12/7/2021
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 19-0183
|
|
|
|
|
| Matthew Cavallo et al v Phoenix Health Plans Inc
|
CV-21-0051-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted as to this issue as rephrased on 3/1/2022: “Were the jury instructions on contract waiver and mitigation of damages proper in this bad faith tort case?”
Opinion issued by the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-20-0167
|
| Graeme Hancock v Hon. O’Neil/State Bar of Arizona
|
CV-21-0145-SA
|
Oral Argument held on 4/12/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Special Action accepted over this rephrased issue on 1/4/2022: Whether and to what extent issue preclusion applies in bar disciplinary proceedings.
|
| Harris/Heartmedia v Hon. Randall Warner/McCarthy
|
CV-21-0242-PR
|
Oral Argument to be held on 4/14/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/4/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Timothy Matthews v ICA/City of Tucson/Tristar
|
CV-21-0192-PR
|
Oral Argument to be held on 4/19/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to this issue as rephrased on 2/8/2022: Is A.R.S. § 23-1043.01(B) unconstitutional as applied to claimants who work in high-stress occupations such as law enforcement?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-IC 20-0001
|
|
|
|
|
| Gred Mills et al v ABTR et al
|
CV-21-0203-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 3/1/2022
Memorandum Decision issued by the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-20-0510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hani W Saba v Sawsan Khoury
|
CV-21-0023-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 10/7/2021
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to Issue 1 only on 8/24/2021
Opinion issued on issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV 19-0609 FC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Arizona Home Builders v Town of Marana
|
CV-21-0211-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 4/5/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CV 20-0087
|
| Staker & Parson Companies v Scottsdale Insurance Co
|
CV-21-0256-CQ
|
Oral Argument to be held on 4/14/2022
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022
|
|
|
|
|
| State v Hons. Brearcliffe/Vasquez et al
|
CV-21-0174-SA
|
Oral Argument held on 2/10/2022
Case Summary not yet available
Jurisdiction accepted on 11/2/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| State v Scott Lee Deshaw
|
CR-21-0400-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted as to Issue one only on 4/5/2022
|
| State v Jordan Christopher Ewer
|
CR-21-0059-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 1/25/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to this rephrased issue on 11/2/2021: Whether a jury instruction on the justification defense of self-defense may incorporate the use of force by both the defendant and the victim as suggested by the language of A.R.S. sec. 13-404(A) or refer only to the defendant as set forth in RAJI Ch. 4.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 19-0162
|
| State v Sergio Fierro Jr
|
CR-20-0435-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 11/16/2021
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to these rephrased issues on 8/24/2021: 1. How should trial courts instruct juries on attempted second-degree murder? 2. Did the trial court’s fundamental error in instructing the jury on attempted second-degree murder prejudice the defendant?
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 19-0161
|
| State v Beau John Greene
|
CR-21-0082-PC
|
Oral Argument held on 3/8/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/4/2022
|
|
|
|
|
| State v Nicolas Luviano
|
CR-21-0329-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted as to this issue as rephrased on 3/1/2022: “What standard governs whether a statute describes a single unified offense or separate offenses, and how does that apply in this case?”
Opinion issued by the Court of Appeals, Division 2, Case No. 2 CA-CR 19-0102
|
|
|
|
|
| State v Bobby Charles Purcell
|
CR-21-0398-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted as to Issue one only on 4/5/2022
|
|
|
|
|
| State v Preston Alton Strong
|
CR-17-0201-AP
|
Oral Argument held on 5/5/2020
Case Summary
|
|
|
|
|
| Swift Transportation Co of AZ v Hon. Carman et al
|
CV-20-0119-PR
|
Oral Argument held on 11/19/2020
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 8/25/2020
|
| TFLTC LLC v Beth Ford
|
CV-21-0133-PR
|
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to this issue as rephrased: Does the holding of Leveraged Land Co. v. Hodges, 226 Ariz. 382 (2011) strictly limit recovery of a plaintiff’s attorney fees and costs in a tax lien foreclosure action under A.R.S. § 42-18201 to only those incurred before the date of redemption, or can a plaintiff recover reasonable attorney fees and costs that were incurred after redemption when those fees were incurred as part of the legal action to which A.R.S. § 42-18206 refers?
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case Nos. 2 CA-CV-2020-0122 et al
|
|
|
|
|
| Gerald Walker et al v Auto-Owners Insurance Comp
|
CV-21-0236-CQ
|
Oral Argument held on 4/12/2022
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022
|
| Aranzi Rae Jon Willis v Hon. Bernini/State
|
CR-21-0258-PR
|
Oral Argument to be held on 2/10/2022
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted as to these rephrased issues on 11/2/2021: 1. Is “clearly exculpatory evidence” defined by the standard set forth in Herrell v. Sargeant, 189 Ariz. 627 (1997) or Trebus v. Davis, 189 Ariz. 621, 623 (1997)? 2. Did the trial court commit error by denying defendant’s motion for remand to the grand jury?
|
| Antoinette Windhurst v ADOC et al
|
CV-21-0288-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 4/5/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CV 20-0162
|
| Tina Zambrano v M & RC II LLC et al
|
CV-21-0205-PR
|
Oral Argument not yet scheduled
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 3/1/2022
Opinion issued by the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-19-0635
|