Agendas and Cases before the Court


 

Tuesday, October 29, 2019 (Parts 2 of 2) - Motions
Tuesday, October 29, 2019 (Parts 2 of 2) - Petitions for Review                               
                         
 
NOTE:  Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate. 
 
 
WALTER ANSLEY et al v BANNER HEALTH NETWORK et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0077-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 11/20/2019
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to issues 1 through 3 and this additional issue:  Are attorney’s fees awardable under either A.R.S. § 12-341.01 or the private attorney general doctrine? 
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 17-0075 
 
BRUSH & NIB et al v CITY OF PHOENIX 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-18-0176-PR 
Opinion issued on 9/16/2019 
Oral Argument  held on 1/22/2019 
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/20/2018 
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-CV 16-0602 
 
Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Review granted as to the following issues rephrased on April 3, 2019: Did the court of appeals err in its rulings: (a) affirming partial summary judgment and holding that the OTCs are “brokers” under Model City Tax Code (“MCTC”) § 444 and therefore their service fees are subject to municipal taxation [Petition]; (b) reversing partial summary judgment and holding that because the OTCs are not “hotels,” they are not subject to taxation under MCTC § 447 [Cross-Petition]; and (c) reversing the superior court’s ruling that the Cities may not assess tax, penalties, and interest for tax years before 2013 [Petition]. 
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case Nos. 1 CA-TX 16-0016 and 1 CA-TX 16-0018 
 
E.H. v HON. SLAYTON/STATE et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0118-PR 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019 
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-SA 19-0004 
 
HWAL’BAY VA J ENTERPRISES INC v HON. JANTZEN/FOX 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0123-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 11/5/2019 
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 
 
JOHNSON UTILITIES LLC v ARIZONA CORPORATION et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0105-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 11/5/2019 
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 8/29/2019 
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No. 1 CA-SA-18-0197 
 
SUSAN LAGERMAN v ARIZONA STATE RETIRMENT SYSTEM 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0101-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-CV 18-0014 
 
SAGUARO HEALING LLC v STATE OF ARIZONA et al 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0129-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019 as to Issue #B only 
Memorandum Decision issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, 1 CA-CV 18-0242 
 
SANDRA R./SERGIO C. v DCS/M.R./F.M./J.M. 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0057-PR 
Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019
Case Summary
Mother's Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to Issue #1 only. 
Appellant Sergio C.'s Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to Issue #2 only as rephrased:  Does it violate due process to make the nexus finding in the best-interests inquiry? 
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-JV 18-0147 
 
STEVEN SHOLEM v HONS. GASS/CONTES/MELISSA LANGEVIN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0149-PR 
Oral Argument to be held on 12/17/2019
Case Summary not yet available 
Petition for Review granted on 9/24/2019 
 
STATE v JOHN MICHAEL ALLEN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0556-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v SAMMANTHA LUCILLE REBECCA ALLEN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0368-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available  
 
STATE v BOBBY RAY CARTER JR 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0508-PR 
Oral Argument held on 9/20/2019
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 4/30/2019, only as to the issues rephrased as follows:  Did the Court of Appeals err in holding that (1) theft is a lesser-included offense of theft as a means of transportation, thus giving rise to impermissible double punishments; (2) theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery, thus giving rise to impermissible multiple punishments; and (3) a more severely-penalized offense can be a lesser-included offense of a less-severely-penalized offense for multiple-punishment purposes? 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No 2 CA-CR 17-0149 
 
STATE v ALAN MATTHEW CHAMPAGNE 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0425-AP 
Opinion issued on 8/7/2019 
Oral Argument held on 4/9/2019
Case Summary
 
STATE v DAVID LEE GREEN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0537-PR 
Oral Argument  held on 9/26/2019
Case Summary   
Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019 
Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0208 
 
STATE v CHARLES MICHAEL HEDLUND 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0377-AP 
Opinion issued on 12/10/2018 
Oral Argument  held on 9/6/2018
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/18/2018 
 
STATE v JAMES CLAYTON JOHNSON 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-16-0261-AP 
Opinion issued on 8/23/2019 
Oral Argument held on 6/6/2019
Case Summary
 
STATE v PHILIP JOHN MARTIN 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0380-PR 
Opinion issued on 8/9/2019 
Oral Argument held on 5/9/2019 
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to this issue only: “Was the prosecution barred by double jeopardy from re-trying Appellant for first degree murder after a conviction of second degree murder in a prior trial?” on 3/20/2019 
Opinion and Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR 16-0551 
 
STATE v JAMES ERIN McKINNEY 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-93-0362-AP 
Opinion issued on 9/27/2018 
Oral Argument  held on 9/6/2018
Case Summary                
 
STATE v HECTOR SEBASTION NUNEZ-DIAZ 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0514-PR 
Opinion issued on 7/16/2019 
Oral Argument held on 5/7/2019
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 3/5/2019 
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One No. 1 CA-CR 16-0793 
 
STATE v RICHARD ALLEN REED 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-19-0059-PR 
Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-CR 17-0620 
 
STATE v THOMAS MICHAEL RILEY 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-15-0411-AP
Oral Argument held on 9/10/2019
Case Summary
 
STATE v PRESTON ALTON STRONG 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-17-0201-AP 
Oral Argument not yet scheduled 
Case Summary not yet available 
 
STATE v OSCAR PENA TRUJILLO 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0531-PR 
 Oral Argument  held on 9/26/2019
Case Summary   

Petition for Review granted on 5/28/2019 as to 1. Was Trujillo entitled to a jury finding on M.A.C.’s age when that fact increased the mandatory minimum sentence affecting sex-offender registration?  2. Was the error harmless?  3.  Should this Court reconsider the opinion in State v. Noble, 171 Ariz. 171, (1992) 

Opinion issued from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CR 17-0241 
 
JOHN TERRELL v RUBY TORRES 
Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-19-0106-PR 
Oral Argument held on 10/15/2019              
Case Summary

Petition for Review granted on 8/27/2019 as to these issues:  1.  Did the court of appeals correctly interpret an in vitro fertilization agreement to permit respondent to use the subject embryos?  2.  Did the court of appeals err by failing to remand for the trial court to balance the parties’ interests concerning disposition of the subject embryos? 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, No 1 CA-CV 17-0617 FC 
 
NOTE:  Cases are listed until the issuance of the Court's mandate.
 
 
Notice: While the clerk's office maintains quality control measures on the information posted, some errors may occur. All posted information is subject to change or amendment.