Search Opinions/Memo Decs


Search filter ON - 16 records found    Clear search filter
Date Range: 1/1/2023 to 12/31/2023
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Search Decisions

12
5/3/2023   CV-22-0187-PRSHEA et al v MARICOPA et alOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; Clint Bolick, Dissent

4/28/2023   CV-21-0292-PRJACOB LAURENCE et al v SALT RIVER PROJECT et alOPINION
 Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; John Pelander, Concur; John R. Lopez, Dissent; James P. Beene, Dissent; Kathryn H. King, Dissent

4/19/2023   CV-21-0277-PRADVANCED PROPERTY TAX v JORGE OTHON AND SPOUSEOPINION
 Kathryn H. King, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur

4/14/2023   CV-21-0242-PRHARRIS/IHEARTMEDIA v HON. RANDALL WARNER/MCCARTHYOPINION
 William Montgomery, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

4/14/2023   CR-21-0082-PCSTATE OF ARIZONA v BEAU JOHN GREENEOPINION
 William Montgomery, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

4/6/2023   SB-22-0062-APIn the Matter of TORI S. BRYANTOPINION
 
 

*Per Curiam

4/3/2023   CR-21-0398-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v BOBBY CHARLES PURCELLOPINION
 Clint Bolick, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

3/24/2023   CV-21-0174-SASTATE v HONS. BREARCLIFFE/VASQUEZ et alOPINION
 James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

 Constitutionality Decision

A.R.S. § 13-4033(C) provides that a defendant may not appeal if the defendant is absent for more than 90 days after conviction and cannot show his or her absence was involuntary. This Opinion holds § 13-4033(C) constitutional because it does not usurp this Court’s authority over procedural rulemaking under article 6, section 5(5) of the Arizona Constitution. 

3/2/2023   CV-22-0041-PRLEGACY FOUNDATION ACTION v CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONOPINION
 Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; John Pelander, Concur

3/2/2023   CV-22-0071-CQEVA CORNELL v DESERT FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION et alOPINION
 John R. Lopez, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur

12