|
| | 7/24/2024 |
| CR-21-0239-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v KEVIN HARRY MONINGER | OPINION |
| | James P. Beene, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 7/22/2024 |
| CV-21-0213-PR | PIMA COUNTY et al v STATE OF ARIZONA et al | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur
|
| | Constitutionality Decision
We hold that the 2018 amendment to A.R.S. § 15-910, which effectively exempts school desegregation expenses from A.R.S. § 15-972(E) state reimbursement calculations, does not violate Article 9, § 18 of the Arizona Constitution. |
|
| | 7/22/2024 |
| CV-23-0016-PR | MESQUITE v ADOR | OPINION |
| | Kathryn H. King, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 7/10/2024 |
| CV-21-0256-CQ | STAKER&PARSON COMPANIES v SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE CO | OPINION |
| | James P. Beene, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 6/27/2024 |
| CV-22-0290-PR | SAN CARLOS v STATE et al/RESOLUTION | OPINION |
| | Kathryn H. King, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 6/25/2024 |
| CV-23-0233-PR | ROAF v REBUCK CONSULTING, et al | OPINION |
| | Robert M. Brutinel, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 6/18/2024 |
| CR-23-0029-PR | STATE OF ARIZONA v KEVIN DUNBAR | OPINION |
| | James P. Beene, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur in part; Dissent in part
|
| | |
|
| | 6/18/2024 |
| CV-23-0160-PR | IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF QUIJADA/DOMINGUEZ | OPINION |
| | Clint Bolick, Author; Robert M. Brutinel, Concur; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Dissent; Kathryn H. King, Dissent
|
| | |
|
| | 6/7/2024 |
| CV-23-0176-PR | DOVE MOUNTAIN, et al v ADOR | OPINION |
| | William Montgomery, Author; Ann Scott Timmer, Concur; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; John Pelander, Concur
|
| | |
|
| | 6/3/2024 |
| CV-23-0181-PR | AMY SILVERMAN, et al. v ADES | OPINION |
| | Ann Scott Timmer, Author; Clint Bolick, Concur; John R. Lopez, Concur; James P. Beene, Concur; William Montgomery, Concur; Kathryn H. King, Concur; John Pelander, Concur
|
| | Constitutionality Decision
A.R.S. § 46-460(A) generally shields from public inspection all records maintained by the Arizona Department of Economic Security concerning abuse, exploitation, or neglect of vulnerable adults. A “bona fide research” exception exists that permits the Department to release these records to researchers. See § 46-460(D)(8). We decide that investigative journalists can qualify as researchers under this exception. We reason, in part, that categorically excluding journalists from this exception would raise serious freedom of speech and equal protection concerns under our state and federal constitutions. |
|
|