R-10-0019
PETITION TO AMEND RULES 34-37, RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT
WOULD REFLECT THAT ADMISSION TO THE BAR MAY BE EITHER BY EXAMINATION OR ON MOTION; WOULD ALLOW THE COMMITTEE ON EXAMINATIONS TO USE ANY TESTING PRODUCT DEVELOPED BY THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS; WOULD CLARIFY THAT APPLICANTS FOR ADMISSION ON MOTION ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR CONDITIONAL ADMISSION; AND WOULD INCORPORATE AND CLARIFY TIME LIMITATIONS FOR ADMISSION ON MOTION AND ADMISSION BY EXAMINATION
Petitioner:
David K. Byers, Director
Administrative Office of the Courts
1501 W. Washington, Suite 411
Phoenix, AZ 58007
602-452-3307
Fax: 602-452-3484
[email protected] Filed January 11, 2010
Comments are due May 20, 2010.
ADOPTED as modified, effective January 1, 2011;
Rules 36(e), 36(f), and 37(c) relating to hearings before the Committee on Character and Fitness
CONTINUED by Order dated September 2, 2010, and
RE-OPENED for comment on alternative proposal -
COMMENTS DUE April 15, 2011.
ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR RULES 36(e), 36(f), and 37(c)MAY BE VIEWED IN ATTACHMENTS 1 & 2 BELOW.
Amendments to Rule 34(b)(1)(E) and (d)(2) ADOPTED on an Emergency Basis. COMMENTS DUE AUGUST 22, 2011.
See Attachment 3 below.
ADOPTED on a permanent basis Rules 34(b)(1)(E) and 34 (d)(2).
ADOPTED as modified (Rules 36 and 37), effective January 1, 2012.