Clerk of the Court banner
HomeAZ Supreme Court > Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court > Agendas and Cases

Agendas and Cases before the Court
 


While the Clerk's Office maintains quality control measures on the information posted, some errors may occur. All posted information is subject to change or amendment.



Agendas
 

Notice: Agendas are listed below until publishing of the Court's minutes

 

Friday, March 1, 2024 - Petitions for Review

 

Tuesday, March 5, 2024 - Petitions for Review

Tuesday, March 5, 2024 - Motions

Tuesday, March 5, 2024 - Petitions for Review, Part 2

Tuesday, March 5, 2024 - Motions, Part 2

 


Granted Cases (Pending Decisions by the Court)

Notice: Cases are listed until the issuance of the Clerk's mandate.

Case Title Case No. Additional Information
Amy Silverman, et al v ADES CV-23-0181-PR

Oral Argument to be held on 04/09/2024

 

Case Summary not yet available

 

Petition for Review granted on 02/06/2024 as to these rephrased issues:

“1.  Did the court of appeals err in deciding what qualifies as “bona fide research” under A.R.S. § 46-460(D)(8), which authorizes DES to disclose confidential records about vulnerable adults to a researcher “engaged in bona fide research,” if no personally identifying information is made available?

2.  Are there any relevant state or federal constitutional considerations in determining whether journalists are included within the "bona fide research" exception under A.R.S. § 46-460(D)(8)?”

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0209

 

 

Francisco, et al. v Affiliated Urologists, et al CV-23-0152-PR

Oral Argument to be held on 04/09/2024

 

Case Summary not yet available

 

Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024

 

Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0701

 

 

 

State of Arizona v Manuel David Perez-Gutierrez CR-23-0137-PR

Oral Argument to be held on 03/19/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0268 

 

 

Arizona Republican Party v Richter CV-23-0208-PR

Oral Argument to be held on 03/14/2024 **(OA on the Road- ASU)**

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 01/09/2024 as to this rephrased issue: Were the awards of attorney fees by the superior court and the court of appeals appropriate?

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0201

 

 

Roaf v Rebuck Consulting, et al CV-23-0233-PR

Oral Argument to be held on 03/14/2024 **(OA on the Road- ASU)**

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 02/06/2024 as to the following rephrased question: 

"Did the Court of Appeals err by finding no prejudicial error in allowing Roaf to proceed against Medstar on separate claims of negligent hiring and vicarious liability when Medstar admitted it was vicariously liable for its employee’s negligence and when Roaf is not seeking punitive damages against Medstar?”

 

Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0620.

 

 

Vande Krol v Supersition/Benchmark CV-23-0211-PR

Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 12/05/2023 as to this rephrased issue: Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that amendments to A.R.S. § 23-901.01 applied to retroactively to the claim of benefits in this case.

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-IC-22-0046.

 

 

Mark Gilmore, et al. v Kate Gallego, et al. CV-23-0130-PR

Oral Argument held on 02/13/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 10/17/2023 as to these rephrased issues:

1.  Does release time violate Petitioners’ free speech, free association, and Right to Work rights?

2.  Do the challenged release time provisions violate the Gift Clause?

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0049 

 

 

Dove Mountain, et al. v. ADOR CV-23-0176-PR

Oral Argument held on 01/23/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023, as to these issues:

1. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated post-tax funds reserved to reimburse the hotel for the cost of future awards to be “gross income” under A.R.S. §§ 42-5070 and -5001(4), (7) when the funds were paid to the hotel upon point redemption? 

2. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated Dove Mountain’s 4.5% remittance to the Marriott rewards program as a payment for membership to a third-party vendor? 

3. Did the Court of Appeals err when it decided that Consumers Market did not serve as controlling precedent?

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0003

 

 

Rendon Quijada v. Pimienta Dominguez CV-23-0160-PR

Oral Argument held on 01/23/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0174-FC

 

 

Satamian v Great Divide et al CV-23-0085-PR

Oral Argument held on 01/16/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to issue number two only.

 

Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0375

 

 

State of Arizona v Bennett Laquan Williams CR-23-0068-PR

Oral Argument held on 01/16/2024

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023.  In addition, the Court asks the parties to address an additional issue.  Therefore, the parties should address these issues:

1.  Whether the Court of Appeals erred by finding that a plea agreement is void when a marijuana-related conviction that was used to enhance its sentence has been expunged pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2862.

2. If so, may the State allege a different prior conviction to enhance the sentence?

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0197 PRPC

 

 

Mesquite v ADOR CV-23-0016-PR

Oral Argument held on 12/19/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0002

 

 

Planned Parenthood et al v Kristin Mayes/Hazelrigg CV-23-0005-PR

Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0116

 

 

State of Arizona v Kevin Dunbar CR-23-0029-PR

Oral Argument held on 12/12/2023

 

Case Summary 

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023

 

Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-21-0069

 

 

State of Arizona v Larry Dean Anderson CR-23-0008-PR

Oral Argument held on 11/21/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to these rephrased issues:

1. Is Anderson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on erroneous advice regarding the availability of parole precluded and untimely considering the extent of confusion in Arizona about the availability of parole after it was abolished? 

2. If not, is erroneous advice about the availability of parole objectively unreasonable in light of the extent of confusion in Arizona surrounding the availability of parole? 

 

Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-22-0121

 

 

CAO, et al v PFP Dorsey, et al CV-22-0228-PR

Oral Argument on 11/21/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition and Cross-Petitions granted in part on 08/22/2023, 

as to these rephrased questions:

1.  Either on its face or as applied in this case, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 authorize the taking of private property for private use in violation of Article 2, § 17 of the Arizona Constitution?

2. If any common elements or units in a condominium are to be sold pursuant to a condominium termination agreement, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 require all the common elements and units to be part of that sale? 

3. If a contract incorporates an unconstitutional statute by reference, are the terms of that statute enforceable as to the contracting parties? 

4. If a condominium declaration incorporates a statute by reference, are subsequent statutory amendments incorporated into the agreement? 

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0275

 

 

San Carlos v State et al/Resolution CV-22-0290-PR

Oral Argument on 11/16/2023 **(OA on the Road- Coconino High School, Flagstaff)**

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review (Appellee ADEQ) granted on 08/22/2023, as to issues number one and two only.

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0295

 

 

In re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. Drummond CV-23-0009-CQ

Oral Argument held on 6/20/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Certified Question accepted on 5/2/2023

 

 

Beck et al v Neville et al CV-22-0134-PR

Oral Argument held on 2/7/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 12/6/2022

 

Memorandum Decision Issued from Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-21-0197

 

 

State of Arizona v Hon. Cooper/Bassett CR-22-0227-PR

Oral Argument held on 1/10/2023

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 11/1/2022

 

 

State of Arizona v Kevin Harry Moninger CR-21-0239-PR

Oral Argument held on 11/09/2022 **(OA on the Road- U of A, Tucson)**

 

Case Summary

 

Petition for Review granted on 08/23/2022

 

Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR-19-0353

 

Staker & Parson Companies v Scottsdale Insurance Co CV-21-0256-CQ

Oral Argument held on 4/14/2022

Case Summary not available

Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022

 

 

State v Preston Alton Strong CR-17-0201-AP

Oral Argument held on 5/5/2020

Case Summary