| Case Title |
Case No. |
Additional Information |
| |
|
|
| Mark Gilmore, et al. v Kate Gallego, et al. |
CV-23-0130-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 02/13/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 10/17/2023 as to these rephrased issues:
1. Does release time violate Petitioners’ free speech, free association, and Right to Work rights?
2. Do the challenged release time provisions violate the Gift Clause?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0049
|
| Dove Mountain, et al. v. ADOR |
CV-23-0176-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 01/23/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023, as to these issues:
1. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated post-tax funds reserved to reimburse the hotel for the cost of future awards to be “gross income” under A.R.S. §§ 42-5070 and -5001(4), (7) when the funds were paid to the hotel upon point redemption?
2. Did the Court of Appeals err when it equated Dove Mountain’s 4.5% remittance to the Marriott rewards program as a payment for membership to a third-party vendor?
3. Did the Court of Appeals err when it decided that Consumers Market did not serve as controlling precedent?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0003
|
| Rendon Quijada v. Pimienta Dominguez |
CV-23-0160-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 01/23/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 11/08/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0174-FC
|
| Satamian v Great Divide et al |
CV-23-0085-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 01/16/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to issue number two only.
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-22-0375
|
| State of Arizona v Bennett Laquan Williams |
CR-23-0068-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 01/16/2024
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023. In addition, the Court asks the parties to address an additional issue. Therefore, the parties should address these issues:
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred by finding that a plea agreement is void when a marijuana-related conviction that was used to enhance its sentence has been expunged pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-2862.
2. If so, may the State allege a different prior conviction to enhance the sentence?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-22-0197 PRPC
|
| Mesquite v ADOR |
CV-23-0016-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 12/19/2023
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-TX-22-0002
|
| State of Arizona v Jose Adrian Agundez-Martinez |
CR-23-0053-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 12/19/2023
Case Summary not yet available
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-21-0369
|
| Planned Parenthood et al v Kristin Mayes/Hazelrigg |
CV-23-0005-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CV-22-0116
|
| State of Arizona v Kevin Dunbar |
CR-23-0029-PR |
Oral Argument to be held on 12/12/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-21-0069
|
| State of Arizona v Larry Dean Anderson |
CR-23-0008-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/21/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/22/2023, as to these rephrased issues:
1. Is Anderson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on erroneous advice regarding the availability of parole precluded and untimely considering the extent of confusion in Arizona about the availability of parole after it was abolished?
2. If not, is erroneous advice about the availability of parole objectively unreasonable in light of the extent of confusion in Arizona surrounding the availability of parole?
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2CA-CR-22-0121
|
| CAO, et al v PFP Dorsey, et al |
CV-22-0228-PR |
Oral Argument on 11/21/2023
Case Summary
Petition and Cross-Petitions granted in part on 08/22/2023,
as to these rephrased questions:
1. Either on its face or as applied in this case, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 authorize the taking of private property for private use in violation of Article 2, § 17 of the Arizona Constitution?
2. If any common elements or units in a condominium are to be sold pursuant to a condominium termination agreement, does A.R.S. § 33-1228 require all the common elements and units to be part of that sale?
3. If a contract incorporates an unconstitutional statute by reference, are the terms of that statute enforceable as to the contracting parties?
4. If a condominium declaration incorporates a statute by reference, are subsequent statutory amendments incorporated into the agreement?
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0275
|
| Neptune Swimming Foundation v City of Scottsdale |
CV-23-0076-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/16/2023 **(OA on the Road- Coconino High School, Flagstaff)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 09/12/2023, as to these issues rephrased:
1. Did the court of appeals err in holding that qualified bids from higher bidders should not be considered when evaluating objective fair market value under the consideration prong of the Gift Clause?
2. Did the City fail to follow its own rules in cancelling a public procurement process and thereby abuse its discretion?
Memorandum Decision from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0053
|
| San Carlos v State et al/Resolution |
CV-22-0290-PR |
Oral Argument on 11/16/2023 **(OA on the Road- Coconino High School, Flagstaff)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review (Appellee ADEQ) granted on 08/22/2023, as to issues number one and two only.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0295
|
| State of Arizona v Daniel Louis Santillanes |
CR-23-0042-PR |
Oral Argument held on 9/13/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 5/2/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CR-21-0389
|
| McMichael-Gombar v Phoenix Civil Service et al |
CV-22-0176-PR |
Oral Argument held on 9/13/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 5/2/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1CA-CV-21-0469
|
| In re: Steven R. Drummond, Mary A. Drummond |
CV-23-0009-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 6/20/2023
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 5/2/2023
|
| Torres et al v Jai Dining Services |
CV-22-0142-PR |
Oral Argument held on 5/25/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 4/4/2023.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-19-0544
|
| Avitia v Crisis Preparation |
CV-22-0288-PR |
Oral Argument held on 5/25/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 4/4/2023
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-21-0083
|
| Barriga v ADES/Precision |
CV-22-0231-PR |
Oral Argument held on 5/11/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 2/28/2023.
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-UB-21-0107
|
| Rosenberg v Sanders |
CV-22-0170-PR |
Oral Argument held on 4/18/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/4/2023, as to this rephrased issue: "Should a ninth factor, based on statements reflecting a grantor's state of mind months after the execution of a deed, be added to the long-standing eight-factor test used in Arizona to determine whether a grantor acted under undue influence?"
Opinion Issued from Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-21-0246
|
| Kay Franklin v CSAA General Insurance |
CV-22-0266-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 4/18/2023
Case Summary
Certfied Question accepted on 1/31/2023
|
| Columbus Life Insurance v Wilmington Trust NA |
CV-22-0202-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 3/14/2023
Case Summary
Certified Question accepted on 12/6/2022
|
| Beck et al v Neville et al |
CV-22-0134-PR |
Oral Argument held on 2/7/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 12/6/2022
Memorandum Decision Issued from Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-21-0197
|
| AZ Petition Partners LLC v Hon. Thompson/State |
CR-22-0154-PR |
Oral Argument held on 1/19/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to issue one only on 11/1/2022
Opinion Issued from Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-SA-21-0170
|
| State of Arizona v Hon. Cooper/Bassett |
CR-22-0227-PR |
Oral Argument held on 1/10/2023
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 11/1/2022
|
| Jacob Laurence et al v Salt River Project et al |
CV-21-0292-PR |
Oral Argument held on 12/13/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 10/12/2022
Memorandum Decision Issued from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-21-0100
|
| Carlos Cruz v Hon. Blair/State of Arizona |
CR-22-0123-PR |
Oral Argument held on 10/24/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted as to issues 1 and 3 only on 08/23/2022
|
| State of Arizona v Kevin Harry Moninger |
CR-21-0239-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/09/2022 **(OA on the Road- U of A, Tucson)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/23/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CR-19-0353
|
| Fidelity National v Osborn III Partners LLC et al |
CV-21-0086-PR |
Oral Argument held on 11/17/2022 **(OA on the Road- South Mountain Community College)**
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 08/23/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division One, Case No. 1 CA-CV-18-0040
|
|
Southern Arizona Home Builders v Town of Marana
|
CV-21-0211-PR |
Oral Argument held on 6/30/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 4/5/2022
Opinion from the Court of Appeals, Division Two, Case No. 2 CA-CV 20-0087
|
| Staker & Parson Companies v Scottsdale Insurance Co |
CV-21-0256-CQ |
Oral Argument held on 4/14/2022
Case Summary not available
Certified Question accepted on 1/4/2022
|
| |
|
|
| State v Hons. Brearcliffe/Vasquez et al |
CV-21-0174-SA |
Oral Argument held on 2/10/2022
Case Summary not yet available
Jurisdiction accepted on 11/2/2021
|
| State v Beau John Greene |
CR-21-0082-PC |
Oral Argument held on 3/8/2022
Case Summary
Petition for Review granted on 1/4/2022
|
| |
|
|
| State v Preston Alton Strong |
CR-17-0201-AP |
Oral Argument held on 5/5/2020
Case Summary
|