| High Profile Cases at the Arizona Supreme Court |
| Last Updated |
Case Number |
Case Title |
Description |
| 09/08/2022 |
CV-22-0207-AP/EL |
Mussi et al. v. Katie Hobbs/ADRC Action |
|
| 08/26/2022 |
CV-22-0203-AP/EL |
Protect Our Arizona v Hobbs/Healthcare Rising |
|
| 08/25/2022 |
CV-22-0204-AP/EL |
Leibsohn et al. v Hobbs/Voters Right to Know |
|
| 08/04/2022 |
CV-22-0196-AP/EL |
Moises Sanchez v Kevin Robinson et al |
|
| 07/19/2022 |
CR-83-0044-AP |
State v Murray Hooper |
|
| 02/28/2022 |
CV-22-0048-SA |
AZ Republican Party et al v Katie Hobbs et al |
|
| 02/11/2022 |
CV-22-0033-SA |
Karen Fann v Hon. Hannah/State et al |
|
| 02/04/2022 |
CV-22-0018-PR |
Karen Fann v Hon. Kemp/American Oversight |
|
| 01/7/2022 |
CV-21-0281-PR |
Cyber Ninjas v Hon. Hannah/PHX Newspapers et al |
|
| 02/07/2022 |
CV-21-0234-T/AP |
Arizona School Boards et al v State of Arizona |
|
| 10/01/2021 |
T-21-0005-CV |
Arizona School Boards et al v State of Arizona |
|
| 09/14/2021 |
CV-21-0185-PR |
Cyber Ninjas v Hon. Warner/PHX Newspapers et al |
|
| 09/7/2021 |
CV-21-0197-PR |
Karen Fann v Hon. Michael Kemp/American Oversight |
Senate President Karen Fann and others seek review of a Court of Appeals decision requiring that the Senate provide documents related to its audit of the November 2020 general election. |
| 04/29/2021 |
CV-21-0102-SA |
Karen Fann, et al. v. Hon. Christopher Coury and AZ Democratic Party, et al. |
Senate President Karen Fann and others brought this special action in the Court after the trial court entered orders pertaining to the ballot audit. Petitioners moved for dismissal of this case after the temporary injunction expired and the Court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice. |
| 04/16/2021 |
CV-21-0058-T/AP |
Karen Fann, et al. v. State of Arizona and Invest in Education |
Senate President Karen Fann and others appealed a trial court decision denying their request to enjoin Proposition 208, “Invest in Education.” The Court granted the petition to transfer and held oral argument on April 20, 2021. |
| 02/08/2022 |
CR-87-0135-AP |
State v. Frank Jarvis Atwood |
In 1987, Atwood was convicted of the murder and kidnapping of an 8-year-old child and sentenced to death. The State of Arizona seeks a warrant of execution. |
| 02/09/2022 |
CR-08-0025-AP |
State v. Clarence Wayne Dixon |
In 2008, Dixon was convicted of the 1978 murder of a college student and sentenced to death. The State of Arizona seeks a warrant of execution. |
| 03/24/2021 |
CV-20-0335-T/AP |
Javier Aguila, et al. v. Doug Ducey, The Arizona Department of Health Services (“ADHS”) and the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control |
Bar owners challenged the Governor’s executive orders closing bars and placing capacity restrictions on reopening. The Court dismissed the case as moot after the Governor issued Executive Order EO 2021-05. |
| 01/06/2021 |
CV-20-0349-AP/EL |
Staci Burk v. Doug Ducey, et al. |
On December 7, 2020, Plaintiff Staci Burk sued state and county officials alleging that she had been denied the right to vote in the November, 3, 2020 general election. The Superior Court dismissed the suit, and this Court affirmed the dismissal. The United States Supreme Court denied Burk’s petition for a writ of certiorari. |
| 12/21/2020 |
CV-20-0343-AP/EL |
Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson et al., and Katie Hobbs |
Plaintiff/Contestant/Appellant Kelli Ward challenged the election of the Biden Presidential Electors. After the County completed its hand count of 5,000 early ballots and Election Day Ballots from two percent (2%) of the voting centers, the Biden Electors were certified as receiving 10,457 more votes than the Trump Electors. The trial court authorized a review of 1626 total ballots. After identifying nine errors, the trial court concluded that the review established that the results “99.45% accurate.” This Court affirmed the trial court decision and confirmed the election of the Biden Electors. |