FAQ

Register       Login

ATTENTION:
This site has been recently moved. 
If you had an account on our old forum site, you will have to register a new account here in order to be able to post replies.
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 11 Mar 2024 07:04 PM by Craig Podgurski
ACJA 7-204: Private Process Server
�6 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
New Member
Posts:6 New Member

--
09 Feb 2024 09:43 AM
    Aaron Nash
    Director, Certification & Licensing Division
    Arizona Supreme Court and Administrative Office of the Courts
    1501 W. Washington St., Ste. 104
    Phoenix, AZ 85007
    602-452-3378
    [email protected]
    Comment deadline is March 11, 2024

    In 2023 the Certification and Licensing Division (Division) proposed changes to the Arizona Code of Judicial Administration (ACJA) § 7-204 to clarify responsibilities of private process server certificate holders, the clerks of court, and the court regarding when a certificate is suspended, revoked, expired, or voluntarily surrendered; to simplify expiration and renewal time frames; and to clarify continuing education requirements while conforming the self-study and real-time education requirements to those of other regulated programs.

    Following an October 2023 presentation, the Arizona Judicial Council (AJC) directed the Division to modify its proposal in response to comments from the public and from AJC members. In December 2023, the AJC voted to adopt the changes referenced above, which were implemented by the Court through Administrative Order 2023-227.

    During the December 2023 meeting, the Division’s update to the AJC included Arizona’s courts and the State Bar as possible resources for private process server continuing education. However, if those resources were available, it would only be during regular business hours for real-time instruction. The Division’s presentation referenced a process server education content provider who indicated they could meet the demand for real-time education. The AJC heard public comments related to the continuing education requirements, including comments from process servers that it would be difficult to obtain the proposed minimum real-time continuing education.

    As a result of input from the public, and following AJC discussion during the December 2023 public meeting, the AJC requested the Division to provide additional information about process servers’ ability to access continuing education relevant to their field of practice and at times and locations appropriate to a process server’s varying and unpredictable work demands.

    After consultation with the Administrative Office of the Courts’ executive office, the Division proposes that continuing education requirements adapt to process servers’ ability to access continuing education relevant to their field of practice and at times and locations appropriate to a process server’s varying and unpredictable work demands. This approach is in response to comments raised by process servers who commented on the prior proposals, who spoke at the AJC’s public meeting, and in response to questions raised by AJC members.

    During review, additional edits, corrections, and clarifications were identified throughout the code section. The Division’s proposal includes the following modifications to ACJA § 7-204:

    Style, organization, and non-substantive edits throughout.

    Substantive changes:
    Definition and structure related to the complaint and discipline process is proposed throughout. Timeframes related to notice and hearings are adjusted to better reflect the time needed for scheduling and processing court matters.

    (F)(7) and (L)(2): Reduces mandatory continuing education from 10 hours each year to three hours each year and cites internally to Code of Conduct topic areas in sections (J) and (L)(4)(a). Public comment is anticipated, with stakeholder arguments for a higher or lower minimum continuing education requirement. Three hours is proposed to allow for competence in regulated subject matter: changes to statutes, court rules, and ACJA changes; plus ethics and professionalism required when serving process.

    (L)(4)(n): Allows process servers to obtain the minimum yearly continuing education credits entirely through self-study. Credits may be obtained through any combination of self-study or real-time courses.
    Additional section:

    (E)(2)(e): This section proposes stylistic and organization changes. Because the counties administer reexaminations, the Division did not propose changes to the requirement that an applicant wait 90 days to retake the certification exam and get written permission to do so. However, the Division welcomes public comment and proposed language related to this provision.
    Attachments
    New Member
    Posts:1 New Member

    --
    12 Feb 2024 11:59 AM
    I am concerned about the proposed change to the number of mandatory Continuing Education credit hours from ten (10) hours to three (3) hours. It has long been argued that more Continuing Education hours should be required due to the complex nature of the role of the process server. There are plenty of resources available to process servers and they should have no difficulty in obtaining ten (10) hours of Continuing Education credit annually.
    New Member
    Posts:1 New Member

    --
    12 Feb 2024 03:22 PM
    I agree , 3 hours is not enough , I don’t understand why all of these changes , the status quo was working just fine and now you think breaking it all out to the counties will work ? I don’t believe it will
    New Member
    Posts:21 New Member

    --
    15 Feb 2024 09:19 PM
    Response to proposed changes to ACJA §7-204(F)(7) and (L)(2); ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n); ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(e)

    The undersigned is an Arizona Certified Process Server and also a Legal Document Preparer and Notary Public, as well as an educational provider to process servers. This response will be limited to that of continuing education requirements and related issues.

    The undersigned objects to changes proposed in ACJA §7-204(F)(7) and (L)(2).
    The undersigned supports changes proposed to ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n).
    The undersigned objects to changes proposed in ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(e).

    There are numerous things that change each year that new and experienced process servers are unaware of. Many new and experienced process servers often receive their only training through mandated continuing education. This is where good continuing education comes in.

    Lessening, as opposed to retaining the mandated 10 hours of continuing education each year diminishes professional education and opportunities for the process server. It also is harmful to the public. A less educated process server is one who is apt to improperly serve documents, resulting in misfeasance of justice.

    The proposed rule changes are harmful to education providers and process servers who wish to share their experience. Those education providers who are still servicing Arizona process servers will likely not find it worthwhile to stay in business if changes proposed in ACJA §7-204(F)(7) and (L)(2) are approved.

    Considering that process servers physically deliver legal process from various courts in several ways and under varied circumstances, reducing the required minimum continuing education hours is a disservice to not only the professional process server, but also to the courts, attorneys, and the public, whether they are involved in litigation or not. There are nuances in serving process that the individual process server must be made aware of, to which three hours per year would not satisfy.

    These changes set the process server and the educational providers up for failure. This proposal is a bad rewrite of the existing rules and should not be approved by the Arizona Judicial Council.
    Attachments
    New Member
    Posts:1 New Member

    --
    16 Feb 2024 07:18 PM
    As a continuing education provider with courses for legal professionals in nine states, I respectfully ask the Certification & Licensing Division to reconsider reducing the number of CE hours required for Arizona certified private process servers. Service of process is a unique vocation, with long hours in a wide variety of environments. It demands professionalism in the face of adversity, and knowledge of codes, rules, and statutes. In working with licensing boards across the country, I have had to adapt to many changes, but reducing CE hours has not been one of them.
    Arizona has always been the standard bearer, in my opinion, for the education it expects for process servers.
    Sabine Hilten
    Administrator/Lead Instructor
    EZ Legal ED®
    EZ Legal ED, LLC
    7000 N. 16th Street
    Suite 120, No. 276
    Phoenix, AZ 85020
    (877) 672-7797 (Toll-Free)
    (602) 317-2175 (Talk/Text)
    www.ezlegaled.com
    New Member
    Posts:21 New Member

    --
    11 Mar 2024 01:26 PM
    The latest proposed changes appear to turn Administrative Order (A.O.) No. 2023-227 and ACJA §7-204 on its head and are concerning to APSA. We see in the latest proposal a series of changes where in many instances there is no need for change. In some instances, proposed changes appear to diminish the value and due process rights of process servers in the state.

    There is only one proposed change [ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n)] to which APSA approves without objection.

    APSA and the state’s process servers have already seen a reduction in other process server course offerings available. APSA believes if the proposed changes are enacted, no positive results will come from reducing the minimum mandated continuing education hours or other related educational changes. Some providers may exit the market, completely.

    A ripple effect of harm to not only the desired professionalism of the process server, but to the knowledge base by which process servers operate and the public depends is projected. The courts and public will feel the adverse effects of having less educated process servers.
    Some of the proposed changes appear to affect the process server's due process rights. In disciplinary matters, process servers are already at a disadvantage. The process server faces an uphill battle in these administrative hearings which start with a presumption of guilt, rather than innocence. These proposed changes do not make that a better situation.

    APSA examined the approved list of process server education to determine the degree of accuracy and viability of pre-approved continuing education providers and classes. He results were disappointing. They are captioned in our comment letter.

    Excepting the changes proposed in ACJA §7-204(L)(4)(n), the Arizona Process Servers Association, as a continuing education provider and association representing many of Arizona’s process servers, objects or remains concerned as to several of the changes proposed, and urges the AJC to not approve the CLD’s requested changes at this time.

    Respectfully submitted,
    Arizona Process Servers Association
    /S/
    Barry R. Goldman
    Administrator, Secretary/Treasurer

    Larry J. Ratcliff, President
    John Osborn, Vice President
    Barry R. Goldman, Administrator, Secretary/Treasurer
    Ronald R. Ezell, Immed. Past Pres.
    Susie Baldwin (Director #1)
    Kay Dean (Director #2)
    Gregory Scott Hardy (Director #3)
    Nathan Botsch (Director #4)
    Matthew Uthe (Director #5)
    Tracy Arnold (Director #6)
    Attachments
    New Member
    Posts:1 New Member

    --
    11 Mar 2024 07:04 PM
    I've been working in the process serving industry for 13 years and our industry is plagued with incompetence and disregard for nature of our work from outside and within. Reducing continuing education to 3 hours per year serves to further intensify these issues. I am opposed to this rule change
    Craig Podgurski
    Arizona Quick Serve
    9393 N 90th St #121
    Scottsdale AZ 85258
    480-314-5050
    Topic is locked