FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].




Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules
                


Welcome!

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

PLEASE READ - CONTACT INFORMATION: 

PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU SUBMIT ALL YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION WHEN SUBMITTING A RULE PETITION OR COMMENT.  OTHERWISE, YOUR SUBMISSION MAY BE REJECTED AND WE WILL BE UNABLE TO ADVISE YOU AS TO WHY. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 13 Jan 2021 02:27 PM by  Yolanda Fox
R-21-0003 ARPOP 35 and ARLFP 91.6 and 91.7
 0 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Yolanda Fox
Basic Member
Posts:173 Basic Member

--
13 Jan 2021 02:27 PM
    ****This petition addresses rules in multiple Forums. Please refer to the petition in the Rules of Protective Order forum to view the petition, attachments, and any comments filed. Any comments submitted for this petition should be done in the Rules of Protective Order forum****

    Family Court Improvement Committee
    Judge Paul McMurdie, Chair
    c/o Susan Pickard, Staff
    1501 W. Washington St., Ste. 410
    Phoenix, Arizona 85007

    The court referred Rule Change Petition R-19-0047 to the Family Court Improvement Committee (FCIC) for input. Briefly, the court indicated that it was concerned with the proposed rule change because A.R.S. § 12-1809 grants all courts, including non-record courts, the authority to determine harassment injunctions. While recognizing the problem when a harassment injunction issued from a non-record court interferes with a superior court’s parenting order, the court sought a process solution to ensure the child’s safety while reconciling the family court orders regarding parenting time and legal decision making. The FCIC, in collaboration with representatives from the Committee on Limited Jurisdiction Courts (LJC), discussed the problem and unanimously endorsed this substitute proposal.

    Would amend Rule 35 of the Ariz. R. Prot. Order P. and Rules 91.6 and 91.7 of the Ariz. R. Fam. L. P. to adopt provisions governing harassment injunctions.

    ****This petition addresses rules in multiple Forums. Please refer to the petition in the Rules of Protective Order forum to view the petition, attachments, and any comments filed. Any comments submitted for this petition should be done in the Rules of Protective Order forum****
    Topic is locked