FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].



Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas
 

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 31 May 2022 12:10 PM by  Susan Pickard
R-22-0006 ARFLP Rule 14
 2 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Susan Pickard
New Member
Posts:30 New Member

--
06 Jan 2022 02:15 PM
    Susan Pickard on behalf of:
    Judge Greg Sakall
    Family Court Presiding Judge
    Pima County Superior Court
    110 West Congress Street
    Tucson, AZ 85701

    In light of the limitations of notary services at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chief Justice issued Administrative Order No. 2020-59 which, in part, relaxed the requirements of Rule 14(a) and provided for an alternative means for verifying a signer’s identity. The temporary changes made by Administrative Order No. 2020-59 have been beneficial. For many who continue to work remotely, it has greatly facilitated the timely filing of documents. There are other benefits as well. Rule 14 properly recognizes that there are some family law filings that are important, and which need the extra safeguard of increased verification of a signer’s identity. However, Administrative Order No. 2020-59 properly addressed that concern by requiring a copy of a driver’s license or other government-issued identification card, and allowed courts the flexibility to accept the alternative form of verification. In short, access to justice has been increased by the certain notarial requirements implemented by Administrative Order No. 2020-59, and its changes, with some minor modifications, should be made permanent.

    Filed: January 6, 2022

    Would amend Rule 14 of the Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure to provide an alternative means of verification when a filing must be verified.

    Comments must be submitted on or before Monday, May 2, 2022.
    Any reply by a petitioner must be submitted on or before Wednesday, June 1, 2022.
    Attachments
    State Bar of Arizona
    Basic Member
    Posts:112 Basic Member

    --
    29 Apr 2022 06:35 PM
    Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421
    General Counsel
    State Bar of Arizona
    4201 N. 24th St., Suite 100
    Phoenix, AZ 85016
    602-340-7236
    [email protected]

    Comment of the State Bar of Arizona
    Attachments
    Susan Pickard
    New Member
    Posts:30 New Member

    --
    31 May 2022 12:10 PM
    Susan Pickard on behalf of:
    Judge Greg Sakall
    Family Court Presiding Judge
    Pima County Superior Court
    110 West Congress Street
    Tucson, AZ 85701

    Pursuant to Rule 28(e)(4) of the Arizona Rules of Supreme Court, the undersigned submits the following Reply in support of the Petition.
    Attachments
    Topic is locked