Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw


Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 


Proposed Local Rules





This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 


Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 16 Oct 2023 05:16 PM by  Denise M. Quinterri
R-23-0046 Rule 36, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court
 0 Replies
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Denise M. Quinterri
New Member
Posts:2 New Member

16 Oct 2023 05:16 PM
    Denise M. Quinterri
    161 E. Inverness Dr.
    Oro Valley, AZ 85737
    [email protected]
    Bar No. 020637

    Filed: October 16, 2023

    Would amend Rule 36(g)(6) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona to provide that a hearing on an alleged violation of a term of a conditional admission would be heard by a panel of five members of the Committee on Character and Fitness rather than a majority of the Committee.

    Comments are not being accepted at this time.
    Topic is locked