FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].



Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas
 

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 25 Apr 2024 06:38 PM by  Amanda McQueen
R-24-0046 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 53, RULES OF THE AZ SUPREME COURT
 0 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
Amanda McQueen
New Member
Posts:15 New Member

--
25 Apr 2024 06:38 PM
    David K. Byers
    Administrative Director
    Administrative Office of the Courts
    1501 W. Washington, Suite 411
    Phoenix, AZ 85007
    (602) 452-3301
    [email protected]

    Petitioner seeks an amendment to Arizona Supreme Court Rule 53, to establish a standing requirement to be considered a complainant in discipline proceedings. In the past, few charges concerning attorneys were submitted for investigation by individuals unrelated to the underlying events. During the past several years, however, charges have been submitted by individuals based on second-hand information, such as news reports. The proposed amendment seeks to balance any positive impact of this increased scrutiny of attorney conduct while reserving procedural protections for those more directly involved.

    Petitioner asks for expedited consideration so the petition may be heard in August and, if approved, adopted on a preliminary basis with consideration for permanent adoption heard in December.

    Filed: April 25, 2024

    Would amend Rule 53 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona to impose a standing requirement to qualify as a complainant in a Bar disciplinary proceeding.

    Comments due no later than May 31, 2024, and any reply by petitioner is due no later than June 17, 2024.
    Attachments
    You are not authorized to post a reply.