Arizona Judicial Branch


Register       Login

NEW! The Court acted on many pending rule petitions at its recent Rules Agenda.  

Click on the Amendments from Recent Rules Agendas link below to go directly to the amendments and orders for each one.

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence


Proposed Local Rules
This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 21 Jul 2014 12:00 PM by  James Kloss
R-13-0044 Petition to Amend Rule 67, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure
 120 Replies
Topic is locked
Page 7 of 7 << < 34567
Author Messages
James Kloss

21 Jul 2014 12:00 PM
James K. Kloss
Phoenix Plaza Tower II
2929 N. Central Ave., Suite 1700
Phoenix, AZ 85012-2761

This amendment addresses the wrong problem. The real problem is the filing of too many lawsuits and the pursuit of a claim when there is no downside to do so. We would be better of considering the English system of loser pays. As it now stands, cases can be filed with very little merit, with the plaintiff and their lawyer knowing they have little disincentive to do so. If a settlement cannot extortionately be taken from an insurance company, about all that is lost is some time for the plaintiff lawyer. The hidden cost to society of marginal claims is tremendous - - think of all the lost time from work, time spent by employees to deal with defense of claims, money spent on risk management, money spent on claims processing, etc. This hidden cost, never talked about, amounts to billions of dollars.

Studies have shown that in countries that don't allow PI suits over low impact auto collisions simply don't have people reporting injuries from such collisions. The reason isn't that Americans are injured more easily in car accidents; the reason people report injuries here from low impact car accidents is because they can sue.

We need to eliminate incentives to sue and create disincentives to sue in marginal cases. Not only should this rule not be changes, we ought to have a rule that everyone, including property owners, post a cost bond in all cases.

Topic is locked
Page 7 of 7 << < 34567