Search 

Azcourts.gov

Arizona Judicial Branch



FAQ

Register       Login

NEW! The Court acted on many pending rule petitions at its recent Rules Agenda.  

Click on the Amendments from Recent Rules Agendas link below to go directly to the amendments and orders for each one.

Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence

 

Proposed Local Rules
                 Welcome!
This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 19 Jun 2017 09:53 PM by  Patricia
R-17-0043 PETITION FOR EXPEDITED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER PER RULE 28 (G) RE: SUPREME COURT RULE 123 PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE JUDICIAL RECORDS OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
 0 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Patricia
New Member
Posts:6 New Member

--
19 Jun 2017 09:53 PM
    Patricia L. Cummins
    14715 S. Camino Tierra Del Rio
    Sahuarita, Arizona 85629
    520.730.5650
    patriciapeaches@aol.com

    Rule amendment would require under Rule of the Supreme Court 123(g) that court clerks afford equal remote electronic access to court records to both counsel and self-representing litigants, including in Family Law cases.

    Petitioner requests an emergency expedited amendment of Supreme Court Rule 123 which has been found to present an urgent matter of unequal provision of remote electronic access to records and filing privileges given to only attorneys in active cases, inclusive of Family Law Cases, while denying pro per litigants of the same. This situation presents compelling circumstances rendering the annual rule processing cycle inadequate. Equal remote electronic access and filing privileges to records must be provided to both parties immediately.

    The recent Amended Statute, A.R.S 12-284.02 (see attachment ) has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2018, which does not provide immediate remedy for active cases where one party may be a Pro Per litigant, against an attorney, now.

    The Department of Justice has a strong interest in ensuring that state and local courts provide every individual with the basic protections guaranteed by the Constitution and other federal laws, regardless of his or her financial means.

    “We urge you to review court rules and procedures within your jurisdiction to ensure that they comply with due process, equal protection, and sound public policy. We also encourage you to forward a copy of this letter to every judge in your jurisdiction; to provide appropriate training for judges in the areas discussed below; and to develop resources, such as bench books, to assist judges in performing their duties lawfully and effectively.

    The Arizona Supreme Court has the power to remedy this imbalance with an Expedited Order and an immediate effective date.
    Thus the reason for the petition on expedited basis due to one party being denied.

    Thank you for your consideration and assistance.

    FILED: June 19, 2017

    Motion for Expedited Consideration DENIED 6/22/2017.

    Comments must be submitted on or before May 21, 2018.
    Attachments
    Topic is locked