Timothy Sandefur
New Member
Posts:4
09 Jan 2019 09:27 AM |
|
Timothy Sandefur (Bar No. 033670), Goldwater Institute, 500 E. Coronado Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85004, (602) 462-5000, [email protected] Would amend Rules 32(c) and (d), Rules of the Supreme Court, to make voluntary some aspects of bar membership and to provide for audit to verify the use of mandatory dues Filed: January 9, 2019 Comments must be submitted on or before May 1, 2019. Replies must be submitted on or before June 1, 2019.
|
|
|
|
Ursula
New Member
Posts:5
11 Feb 2019 12:40 PM |
|
Ursula Johnston 2265 E. LaCosta Place Chandler, AZ 85249 480-993-3921 [email protected] As a law-abiding citizen who has lived in Maricopa County since 2004, I support this petition. I recently went through a divorce that should have been simple (no children, no alimony), yet the case was dragged through the courts for years and resulted in over 250 filings that I took to the Supreme Court. As I went through this ordeal, I connected the dots on some things that point to systemic weaknesses with the way attorneys and judges are hired, treated and trained in our county. Some of the problem ties to the way the AZ Bar Association is structured. This petition will help to strengthen the oversight of quality attorneys in our community. It will also be a step in the right direction to better inform and protect the public from unscrupulous attorneys. I can be reached for comment or clarification at 480-993-3921 or [email protected]
|
|
|
|
AZStateBar
Basic Member
Posts:164
22 Apr 2019 04:19 PM |
|
Comment of the State Bar of Arizona Lisa M. Panahi, Bar No. 023421 General Counsel, State Bar of Arizona 4201 N. 24th St., Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85016 602-340-7236 [email protected]
|
|
|
|
Mo
New Member
Posts:9
29 Apr 2019 05:58 PM |
|
Mauricio R. Hernandez (#020181) [email protected] P.O. Box 7347 Goodyear, AZ 85338 Telephone: (623) 363-2649
|
|
|
|
Kevin.Heade
New Member
Posts:11
30 Apr 2019 12:56 PM |
|
I support this Petition for the reasons articulated by Maurice Hernandez on April 29, 2019. Additionally, I support the Petition because smaller alternative bar associations would benefit from a bifurcated State Bar. If attorneys were not compelled to pay mandatory bar dues to cover non-essential regulatory functions, they would have more money to join alternative bar associations which more align with their interests and political ideology -Kevin Heade AZ State Bar # 029909 620 W Jackson St Ste 4015 Phoenix, AZ, 85003-0638
|
|
|
|
Andrea Angulo Gutierrez
New Member
Posts:2
01 May 2019 07:16 AM |
|
I support this Petition for Rule Change. I concur with my Colleague Mauricio Hernandez' Response. I also would like to add that I wish to have the Bar no longer integrated as I believe the Bar is not serving our community well. I do not believe the Bar speaks for everyone who is licensed. Additionally, I do not appreciate the fact that the Bar is able to keep their books private. I, as a forced member, ought to be able to see the Bar's income and expenses for myself. I am not able to do this. My dues are out of control. They are NOT affordable. Change needs to happen. The Bar needs to be bifurcated! Andrea Angulo Gutierrez Owner, The Angulo Law Firm, PLLC PO Box 8025 Chandler, AZ 85246-8025 602-820-5173 theangulolawfirm.com
|
|
|
|
George A. Schade, Jr.
New Member
Posts:1
01 May 2019 07:33 AM |
|
I support the Petition to Amend Rules 32(c) and (d). I have read the comments submitted by Mauricio R. Hernandez and agree with them. The State Bar has to focus on the functions that will best serve the legal profession and become more cost effective and transparent. The First Amendment right of attorneys must be safeguarded. Dues have been steadily rising to the point that all of us must consider valid, beneficial, and practical ways to improve the situation. Fear of change must not dominate the issues raised by the petition. I further suggest that this website be made more user friendly. George A. Schade, Jr. 5701 E Wilshire Dr Scottsdale, AZ 85257-1951 Arizona State Bar No. 003289
|
|
|
|
NE Suriel
New Member
Posts:1
01 May 2019 07:57 AM |
|
Subject: RE: R-19-0005 Petition to Amend Rules 32(c) and (d), Rules of the Supreme Court I support this Petition for the reasons articulated by Mauricio Hernandez on April 29, 2019. Nic Suriel AZ State Bar # 016317 1430 E Indian School Rd., suite 200 Phoenix, AZ, 85014
|
|
|
|
Richard W. Morris
New Member
Posts:2
01 May 2019 10:00 AM |
|
I support this Petition for Rule Change. I concur with the responses of my colleague Mauricio Hernandez and the others who have responded in the support of this change. The Bar should be the champion of freedom and individual liberty, not champion itself at the expense of both lawyers and the public. Richard W. Morris 13951 West Grand Avenue #203 Surprise, AZ, 85374-2436 623-583-1040
|
|
|
|
Tim Holt
New Member
Posts:1
01 May 2019 10:42 AM |
|
I support this Petition for the reasons articulated by Maurice Hernandez on April 29, 2019. Additionally, I support the Petition because smaller alternative bar associations would benefit from a bifurcated State Bar. If attorneys were not compelled to pay mandatory bar dues to cover non-essential regulatory functions, they would have more money to join alternative bar associations which more align with their interests and political ideology Timothy W. Holt SBN 009724 6751 N. Sunset Blvd., Ste. 320 Glendale, Az 85305 623-334-6800 [email protected]
|
|
|
|
James C. Mitchell
New Member
Posts:1
01 May 2019 10:51 AM |
|
James C. Mitchell State Bar No. 017387 1098 W. Shoal Creek Lane Oro Valley, AZ 85737 520-907-2478 [email protected] I support this Petition for the reasons stated therein and in the comment by Mauricio R. Hernandez. Individual lawyers need a more independent organization than exists today to voice their concerns in regulatory matters. This is not possible with the current integrated bar. The State Bar is a creature of the Arizona Supreme Court. It understandably acts in concert with the Court on regulation. Like all co-dependency, this relationship can have harmful consequences. For example, if lawyers had a strong independent voice in 1989, we might have been spared the costly, useless mandate for so-called continuing legal education. With the benefit of advocacy from a voluntary bar component, the Arizona Supreme Court might have better understood that MCLE had no proven success in the states where it was imposed since 1974. This remarkable record of failure has been maintained ever since. So has the mandatory bar’s hollow defense of it. Recent scholarly research and commentary indicate that most MCLE contributes nothing to attorney professionalism or public protection. Nevertheless, State Bar members have been compelled to waste tens of millions of dollars and countless hours on this boondoggle. Individual members’ prayers for reform are ignored. A voluntary bar component might have sufficient influence to help stop the bleeding. If it chooses not to inform the Court of member views and actual evidence on regulatory issues, then like-minded colleagues and I could choose to withhold our support. Principled regulation of our profession deserves broad support. To that end, we must avoid conflicts in which an institution’s authority to require membership encourages it to act or speak in ways contrary to members’ interests. The Petition’s proposals mitigate that problem while leaving in place a vital system of regulation and public protection directed by the Arizona Supreme Court. I respectfully urge the Court to adopt the Petition.
|
|
|
|
Linda Marie Brown
New Member
Posts:1
01 May 2019 01:21 PM |
|
I support this petition. While I respect all of what the State Bar of Arizona ("SBA") has to offer its members, I find that a bifurcated structure will allow practitioners freedom to decide whether they wish to participate in various activities that are coordinated by the SBA. The SBA purports its mission as follows: "Mission Statement. The State Bar of Arizona exists to serve and protect the public with respect to the provision of legal services and access to justice. Consistent with these goals, the State Bar of Arizona seeks to improve the administration of justice and the competency, ethics, and professionalism of lawyers practicing in Arizona." In further support of the petition, I believe that under the current structure it gives the appearance of a conflict of interest, specifically, the rooster minding the henhouse wherein the SBA is charged with attorney discipline, protecting the public and yet advocating for attorneys. Linda Marie Brown SBN 025382 15333 N Pima Rd Ste 305 Scottsdale AZ 85260 Email: [email protected]
|
|
|
|
Gregory Falls
New Member
Posts:3
01 May 2019 02:17 PM |
|
Gregory W. Falls Sherman & Howard, L.L.C. 201 East Washington Street, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 (602) 240-3000 Fax: (602) 240-6600 [email protected] 011206
|
|
|
|
Timothy Sandefur
New Member
Posts:4
30 May 2019 11:00 AM |
|
Timothy Sandefur (Bar No. 033670), Goldwater Institute, 500 E. Coronado Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85004, (602) 462-5000, [email protected]
|
|
|
|