FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to SACrtDocs@courts.az.gov.




Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules
                


Welcome!

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

PLEASE READ - CONTACT INFORMATION: 

PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT YOU SUBMIT ALL YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION WHEN SUBMITTING A RULE PETITION OR COMMENT.  OTHERWISE, YOUR SUBMISSION MAY BE REJECTED AND WE WILL BE UNABLE TO ADVISE YOU AS TO WHY. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 01 Jun 2020 10:01 AM by  Yolanda Fox
R-20-0008 PETITION TO AMEND RULE 3, RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS
 2 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
Aditya Dynar
New Member
Posts:3 New Member

--
09 Jan 2020 11:57 AM
    Pursuant to Rule 28, Ariz. R. Sup. Ct., the New Civil Liberties Alliance (“NCLA”) petitions this Court to amend Arizona Rule of Procedure for Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions 3 (“JRAD Rule 3”). The proposed amendments to JRAD Rule 3 will remedy the inadvertent adoption of the preliminary-injunction standard as the “good cause” standard under A.R.S. § 12-911 for stays of administrative decisions (“2018 JRAD Rule 3 Amendment”). The proposed rule would replace the preliminary-injunction standard with the court-recognized “colorable claim” standard for stays adopted under A.R.S. § 12-911.

    Aditya Dynar (031583)
    New Civil Liberties Alliance
    1225 19th St. NW, Suite 450
    Washington, DC 20036
    (202) 869-5210
    Adi.Dynar@NCLA.legal
    Attorney for Petitioner

    Would amend JRAD Rule 3 to modify the standard required for a stay of an administrative decision

    Filed January 9, 2020.

    Comment must be submitted on or before May 1, 2020.

    Replies must be submitted on or before June 1, 2020.

    ORDERED: Petition to Amend Rule 3, Rules of Procedure for Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions = ADOPTED, effective January 1, 2021.
    Attachments
    Yolanda Fox
    Basic Member
    Posts:160 Basic Member

    --
    01 May 2020 12:05 PM
    Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation
    at the GOLDWATER INSTITUTE
    Timothy Sandefur (033670)
    Jonathan Riches (025712)
    500 E. Coronado Rd.
    Phoenix, AZ 85004
    (602) 462-5000
    Litigation@goldwaterinstitute.org

    Goldwater Institute’s Comment in Support of the Petition to Amend Rule 3, Rules of Procedure for Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions.
    Attachments
    Yolanda Fox
    Basic Member
    Posts:160 Basic Member

    --
    01 Jun 2020 10:01 AM
    Adi Dynar
    Litigation Counsel
    New Civil Liberties Alliance
    1225 19th Street NW, Suite 450
    Washington, DC 20036
    Telephone: (202) 869-5210
    Direct Dial: (202) 908-6202
    Cell Number: (602) 582-0356
    Adi.Dynar@NCLA.Legal

    Petitioner submits the attached Reply.
    Attachments
    Topic is locked