FAQ

Register       Login

YOUR HELP NEEDED: If you find a cross-reference that does not match the rule or subsection it refers to or any apparent clerical errors, please let us know by sending a precise description to [email protected].



Message from the Chief Justice

Current Arizona Rules on Westlaw

 

Amendments from Recent Rule Agendas
 

Rule Amendments (2006 to present) 

 

Proposed Local Rules

                

 

Welcome!

 

This website allows you to electronically file and monitor court rule petitions and comments and to view existing rules of court, recent amendments of those rules, and pending rule petitions and comments. Any visitor to this site may view posts on this website, but to post a petition or comment you must register and log in. To view instructions on how to register and how to file a petition or comment, please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

BEFORE POSTING, PLEASE READ: 

Contact Information

Please include all of your contact information when submitting a rule petition or comment.  Otherwise, your submission may be rejected and we will be unable to advise you as to why. 

     
PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 27 Apr 2021 03:13 PM by  kradwanski
R-21-0003 ARPOP 35 and ARLFP 91.6 and 91.7
 1 Replies
Sort:
Topic is locked
Author Messages
yfox
Basic Member
Posts:238 Basic Member

--
05 Jan 2021 11:23 AM
    Family Court Improvement Committee
    Judge Paul McMurdie, Chair
    c/o Susan Pickard, Staff
    1501 W. Washington St., Ste. 410
    Phoenix, Arizona 85007

    The court referred Rule Change Petition R-19-0047 to the Family Court Improvement Committee (FCIC) for input. Briefly, the court indicated that it was concerned with the proposed rule change because A.R.S. § 12-1809 grants all courts, including non-record courts, the authority to determine harassment injunctions. While recognizing the problem when a harassment injunction issued from a non-record court interferes with a superior court’s parenting order, the court sought a process solution to ensure the child’s safety while reconciling the family court orders regarding parenting time and legal decision making. The FCIC, in collaboration with representatives from the Committee on Limited Jurisdiction Courts (LJC), discussed the problem and unanimously endorsed this substitute proposal.

    Would amend Rule 35 of the Ariz. R. Prot. Order P. and Rules 91.6 and 91.7 of the Ariz. R. Fam. L. P. to adopt provisions governing harassment injunctions.

    Filed; January 5, 2021

    Comments must be submitted on or before Monday, May 3, 2021.

    Replies must be submitted on or before Tuesday, June 1, 2021.
    Attachments
    kradwanski
    New Member
    Posts:11 New Member

    --
    27 Apr 2021 03:13 PM
    Honorable Wendy A. Million
    Magistrate, Tucson City Court
    103 E. Alameda
    Tucson, AZ 85701
    Chair, Committee on the Impact of Domestic Violence and the Courts
    Staff: [email protected]
    Telephone (602) 452-3360

    The Committee on the Impact of Domestic Violence and the Courts (CIDVC) has authorized the Honorable Wendy A. Million, CIDVC chair, to file this comment to Petition No. R-21-0003 on the committee’s behalf. For the reasons stated in the petition, CIDVC supports R-21-0003. CIDVC also acknowledges the efforts of member Judge Marianne Bayardi, Phoenix Municipal Court, and Judge Elizabeth Finn, Glendale City Court, to collaborate with the Family Court Improvement Committee on a solution. Their participation was integral to developing a workable solution for both limited jurisdiction and superior courts.

    Respectfully submitted this 27th day of April, 2021.
    Topic is locked

    Forums Rule Change Petitions under Consideration Rules of Protective Order