Corey Lovato
Chair, Council on Persons with Disabilities in the Legal Profession
Phone: (623) 688-3250
[email protected] AZ Bar #: 034202
Re: Petition to Amend Rules 32(b) and (c), Rules of the Supreme Court
The Council on Persons with Disabilities in the Legal Profession (CPWDLP) opposes the Petition. We encourage the Court to reject the Petition as it undermines the Arizona Bar’s ability to accomplish its Court-mandated mission to serve and protect the public regarding legal services and access to justice.
The Petition purportedly seeks to decrease membership fees by limiting the State Bar to performing only narrowly defined “regulatory activities” in order to oversee the legal profession in Arizona. However, the Bar’s mission goes far beyond mere regulation. It performs a multitude of nonregulatory activities that protect the public and sustain Arizona’s legal profession, including:
- Fee Arbitration Program: Provides a free and efficient way to resolve disputes between clients and attorneys.
- Ethics Hotline: Provides Arizona attorneys with a way to navigate ethical hazards and avoid ethical missteps in practice, thus enhancing the profession’s protections and perception.
- CLE Programs: Offer Arizona attorneys an array of diverse and affordable CLE options, thus ensuring attorneys have access to pertinent, well-presented CLE material.
- Provide outreach to the public and legal community.
- Maintain educational programs on substantive law, best practices, procedures, ethics, and discussion forums for administration of justice, law practice, and report recommendations.
- Host the Annual Bar Convention, which offers 45-50 seminars on a wide variety of substantive legal topics that advance Arizona attorneys’ knowledge and skills.
- Organize pro bono legal services that expand access to justice and the Arizona court system to all Arizonans.
Each of the above programs furthers the Bar’s mission to serve and protect the public, and this is far from an exhaustive list. The CPWDLP values its partnership with and support from the State Bar in order to expand access to the legal profession to persons with disabilities who have been traditionally overlooked in the legal profession. Continuing that partnership is vital to our mission. Accordingly, we urge the Court to refrain from adopting the proposed Rule 32 amendments in the Petition.